Skip to comments.
California: Arnold Fesses Up and People Are Mad -- at the Messenger
Los Angeles Times ^
| October 3, 2003
| Steve Lopez
Posted on 10/03/2003 6:57:13 AM PDT by John Jorsett
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-113 last
To: baseballmom
Steve Lopez writing for the LATimes. Hasn't changed a bit since leaving Philly. Still a looooooooooser. LA's loss was our gain. :-)
To: John Jorsett
We need a email address.
I am glad this reporter opened this can'o'worms.
102
posted on
10/03/2003 10:21:17 PM PDT
by
CyberCowboy777
(Am I Intelligent? Have you ever heard of Plato? Aristotle? Socrates? - - Morons.)
To: Stone Mountain
Would you accept such an explanation if it was your sister or daughter was treated in this way? My sister was treated in this way and the guy who did it to her later became her husband.
103
posted on
10/03/2003 10:26:27 PM PDT
by
usadave
To: doug from upland
If it's any consolation the media is finally mentioning Juanita. Brit Hume pointed out how Arnold's groping appeared on page one whereas Xlintoon's rape accusation was mentioned on page 35 only after David Kendall denied it. Dan Abrams (MSNBC) just said he would have wished that those who outed Arnold would have shown the same courtesy to Xlintoon and plastered the Juanita accusations on the front page.
104
posted on
10/03/2003 10:30:43 PM PDT
by
StarFan
To: NittanyLion
Sexual assault is not "acting irresponsibly". It's a crime.Makes me wonder why these women didn't report this "crime" at the time that it allegedly happened. Maybe they didn't realize that they were the victim of a "crime".
105
posted on
10/03/2003 10:37:34 PM PDT
by
usadave
To: fqued
Thank your for interpreting the correct intent behind my poor language.
While Arnold was at 73% a couple of hours ago, a couple of days ago is was, I believe, approaching 90%. My point is that Davis's slime is apparently having the desired effect.
To: dennisw
LATIMES had a "team" of reporters working 7 weeks on digging up dirt on Arnold.
If the LA Times had that "team" looking 30 yrs into my past they might have found one or two wemen willing to say I groped,fondled or otherwise abused them.If I were a multi millionaire they'd find 20, if they found my X wife she'd have them convinced I'm the antichrist.
107
posted on
10/04/2003 12:06:36 AM PDT
by
edchambers
(Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket)
To: John Jorsett
I would have thoughtWas this supposed to be an OP-ED or or an news article?
To: usadave
Makes me wonder why these women didn't report this "crime" at the time that it allegedly happened. Maybe they didn't realize that they were the victim of a "crime". Dunno...maybe because they were concerned the situation would devolve into something similar to the Kobe Bryant case.
109
posted on
10/04/2003 6:31:07 AM PDT
by
NittanyLion
(Character Counts)
To: NittanyLion
Sexual assault is not "acting irresponsibly". It's a crime. If there was a crime commited why didn't any of these women press charges or even report it?
Did he rape anybody? No.
And as far as simply touching a woman and making an inappropriate comment, these things happen all the time in bars etc. and we don't know all the circumstances.
One of the accusers I saw on TV sounded like she really enjoyed his attention but because it was inappropriate seemed to feel obligated to claim she was offended.
I think this is all a tempest in a tea pot.
110
posted on
10/04/2003 6:36:07 AM PDT
by
Jorge
To: StarFan
Thanks for the info. Since I don't watch much TV and don't have cable, who is Abrams? Is he on our side or the dark side usually?
111
posted on
10/04/2003 8:01:38 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
To: doug from upland
Dan Abrams followed in the footsteps of his famous father (both are attorneys)and I always felt he was on the dark side but cannot cite why. However, listening to his outrage last night, I now have second thoughts.
Are you familiar with Neal Cavuto of foxnews? I happend to catch a replay of his earlier show last night in which he said he found it strange that such a commotion was being made over Arnold's groping yet not a peep about Juanita's rape allegations (paraphrasing). In two days I've heard her name mentioned by four TV personalities questioning where the media's outrage was back then.
112
posted on
10/04/2003 4:22:05 PM PDT
by
StarFan
To: StarFan
I know of Cavuto. It is amazing that groping (which indeed is terrible behavior) gets more play than a vicious biting rape by an attorney general who later took over the White House.
113
posted on
10/04/2003 4:25:40 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-113 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson