Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lainie
Just the fact that he is dodging the drug question is brutally harmful to Rush. If there was nothing there, or nothing to hide, he would say so......Simple as that.

Not a good day for Rush.

I guess we wont be hearing the "maggot infested, dope smoking" saying today........


415 posted on 10/03/2003 9:29:31 AM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies ]


To: Joe Hadenuf
[nodding disappointedly]
426 posted on 10/03/2003 9:30:35 AM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Hadenuf
"Just the fact that he is dodging the drug question is brutally harmful to Rush. If there was nothing there, or nothing to hide, he would say so......Simple as that.
"

Lawyer or not, you are correct. If he was not taking these prescription drugs bought without a prescription, the appropriate line is:

There are stories in the news about me taking prescription drugs obtained illegally. I will say just one thing about that. The stories are untrue. Now let's move on to my ESPN nonsense.

He gets in no trouble with a simple denial.
537 posted on 10/03/2003 9:44:01 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Hadenuf
I am amazed at all the hysteria around here.

Everyone is wondering why Rush has not come to expeditiously plead "Guilty" or "Not Guilty" to, as yet unknown, drug allegations.

Obviously not many people here have been involved in, or been part of 'criminal' investigations.

When government authorities are in the midst of gathering evidence for potential violations of, and prosecution under, a criminal code. EVERYONE they THINK could be connected, or involved in some way, is deemed to be worthy of interview, and/or 'investigation'.

Even the "innocent" (those who may have been 'involved' in some fashion, but not 'criminally' liable), have to be careful and seek 'legal' protection. WHY? Because the government authorities don't 'always' care about your innocence, and will seek to include you in their dragnet.

In the best case scenario, it is POSSIBLE that Rush may have been 'involved' in SOME way in this entire situation, but not 'criminally', and there could be 'dark forces' out there to 'push' evidence/testimony on him into the 'criminal' part, which could make this a more 'complicated' set of events.....and may explain why he said he does not know the "entire scope" of this situation at this very moment.



652 posted on 10/03/2003 10:04:04 AM PDT by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson