Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/03/2003 12:50:37 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
Schwarzenegger camp knew full well what would be rehashed in the pre-election smear.

Ducks in row all around. TB ain't off the bus out the loop here.

2 posted on 10/03/2003 12:57:20 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Your Donation Helps Counter These Guys

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 10/03/2003 12:58:35 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion; BibChr; EggsAckley; Tamsey; Robert_Paulson2; Poohbah; My2Cents; LaraCroft; ...
A MUST READ
4 posted on 10/03/2003 1:01:13 AM PDT by onyx (Ask the Indian$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DoctorZIn
ping
5 posted on 10/03/2003 1:02:44 AM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
She's great to write this for FrontPageMag.com. You should read the comments section they have. They don't require you use your login as your identification and they do not, in any way, censor any post.

It's a free for all and she gets massive hatred thrown at her for being a "traitor" and such. If you think the left hates the right, just wait until you leave the left for the right. It's down right nasty.

Tammy Bruce is tough. And the fact she's unavailable to men only makes her tougher. I think the men on the left hate homosexuals more than they let on.

7 posted on 10/03/2003 1:04:07 AM PDT by Fledermaus (I DONATED! HAVE YOU? DONATE NOW OR I'LL HAVE YOU PUT BACK ON THE DO NOT CALL LIST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Good article.
8 posted on 10/03/2003 1:13:46 AM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Kudos for Tammy. Arnold did the difficult thing but also the right thing. He earned our trust. Now he has to follow through on it.
10 posted on 10/03/2003 2:38:50 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
To admit his mistakes is the action of a grown man and a conservative. Clinton was neither. I have more respect for Arnold now than i did before. I may still disagree with his gun stance and his abortion stance but I have much more confidence in him being a governor.
11 posted on 10/03/2003 2:51:47 AM PDT by Sentis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Four of the six women in the tabloid Los Angeles Times story were unnamed and hence unverifiable by anybody else. The first of the only two testable cases happened in 1975, 28 years ago, and involved a fellow body-builder’s wife who says Arnold touched her breast. The Times could find no witness who saw this happen, although she says it happened in crowded Gold’s Gym near Venice Beach, California. Her husband has sustained a longtime envy-filled personal feud against the vastly more successful Schwarzenegger, gaining publicity for himself weeks ago by making accusations that the actor said things that could be interpreted as racist….a fact not mentioned in Thursday’s Times story.

The only other case in which the Times named a purported victim allegedly happened in December 2000 and involved British television host and interviewer Anna Richardson, who says Schwarzenegger touched her left nipple after sitting her on his knee.

In this case there is one eyewitness to the incident, Hollywood publicist Sheryl Main, who the Times acknowledges says “it was Richardson who provocatively approached Schwarzenegger…. After finishing the brief interview, Richardson rose, cupped her right breast in her right hand and said ‘What do you think of these?’ She then sat on his lap and was immediately escorted from the room.” According to Main, “Richardson later concocted her story.” The Times could find no witness who corroborated Richardson’s story. Richardson on her British TV show frequently makes flamboyant sexual displays and statements, another fact not mentioned by the Times reporters.

13 posted on 10/03/2003 3:46:30 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I just love Tammy. She, along with Paglia, are amongst my favorite lesbians. It is difficult being a "minority" and being conservative, but she always aquits herself well. I have seen her appearance on "The view", and she just crushes those gals!
14 posted on 10/03/2003 4:39:37 AM PDT by Paradox (I dont believe in taglines, in fact, this tagline does not exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The Dem establishment is cooked.
15 posted on 10/03/2003 4:44:37 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
AMAZING! Compare this to Susan enstrich's equal bashing of the LA Times.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/994337/posts
A Deplorable October Surprise (Susan Estrich re: LA Times)
18 posted on 10/03/2003 8:07:43 AM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Join Us…Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

19 posted on 10/03/2003 9:29:37 AM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson