To: Pokey78; MJY1288; Calpernia; Grampa Dave; anniegetyourgun; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BOBTHENAILER; ...
Very late must-read. Thanks, Pokey. Thank you, Andrew Sullivan.
Translation: Saddam was lying to the U.N. as late as 2002. He was required by the U.N. to fully cooperate. He didn't. The war was justified on those grounds alone. Case closed. Some of the physical evidence still remains, despite what was clearly a deliberate, coordinated and thorough attempt to destroy evidence before during and after the war.
Why was our "news" filled with Wilson leaks, Rush and Arnold attacks yesterday?
Andrew provides links, and did what every free reporter in the civilized world should have done yesterday - read David Kay's report.
If you want on or off my Pro-Coalition ping list, please Freepmail me. Warning: it is a high volume ping list on good days. (Most days are good days).
77 posted on
10/03/2003 6:04:39 AM PDT by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("We love the Americans here." ~ Mustafa Adna, 18, a Turkmen fruit vendor, Kirkuk, 9/26)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Good Stuff ~ Bump!
100 posted on
10/03/2003 10:16:13 AM PDT by
blackie
To: Ragtime Cowgirl; Grampa Dave; BOBTHENAILER; Miss Marple
Why was our "news" filled with Wilson leaks, Rush and Arnold attacks yesterday? 
DISTRACTION
In the way Kosovo distracted from the Cox Report.
114 posted on
10/03/2003 7:06:43 PM PDT by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
"Why was our "news" filled with Wilson leaks, Rush and Arnold attacks yesterday?"
The convergence of events is no accident, IMO.
Steve Centani, Fox, has been reporting what Dr. Kay's report ACTUALLY said today. Of course, it's too little too late because the negative sound bytes were picked up yesterday.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson