Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cabinet rejects 'Buy American' provision compromise
govexec.com ^

Posted on 10/02/2003 9:00:19 PM PDT by chance33_98

Cabinet rejects 'Buy American' provision compromise

By Amy Svitak, CongressDaily

During a top-level meeting of key Bush administration officials Wednesday night, several Cabinet members again rejected the Pentagon's proposed compromise on controversial "Buy American" legislation included in the House version of the fiscal 2004 defense authorization bill.

The revised language was drafted by Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz in response to concerns raised by other executive branch agencies at a meeting last Friday with Wolfowitz, White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and other senior agency officials, according to congressional and industry sources.

Although the White House, Defense and State departments were unable to comment Thursday afternoon, Wolfowitz, Card, Secretary of State Colin Powell and Office of Management and Budget Director Joshua Bolten are said to have attended the meeting. Powell apparently had little to say, but his presence likely gave weight to State Department opposition expressed by his deputy at last week's meeting.

While the administration's position has yet to be formally articulated, sources said it appears that key Cabinet officials at the meeting were not satisfied with the Pentagon's latest iteration of the Buy American provisions.

However, an undated Pentagon briefing paper that appears to have been drafted for Wolfowitz since last Friday shows the department was confident it had allayed other agencies' concerns. According to the document, Wolfowitz was expected to thank Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John Warner, R-Va., for his "forbearance as we have worked through the process of establishing an administration position." The paper also noted that Warner's letters late last Tuesday to the State Department, OMB and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative were "helpful in putting clarity to a number of issues those departments had with the original House language."

Those letters revealed Warner's surprise at the administration's willingness to back a compromise on House Armed Services Committee Chairman Dubcan Hunter's Buy American provisions after Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in July recommended a presidential veto of the bill if it included the House language.

The letters also requested written clarification of the administration's position. The talking points also noted that Warner's letters brought to light issues worth raising and that edits made to the House language since last Friday's interagency meeting "address Commerce, State and USTR concerns."

As for Hunter, Wolfowitz expected to tell the chairman that State, Commerce and USTR had aired grievances "that we had to address," adding that the revised compromise released by OMB Tuesday "is the administration position."

One Senate aide reacted strongly to the briefing paper, saying, "Time and again, this Pentagon has displayed a level of arrogance that is appalling."

However, in an interview earlier today, Hunter stressed that Wolfowitz did not volunteer to work out the compromise, and was designated through the White House chain of command as the point man for the negotiations.

"Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz took valuable and personal time to do this in an honorable and professional manner ... and pushed aside other duties with respect to Iraq to get this done, and we should all be very appreciative," Hunter told CongressDaily. "He has taken on a difficult task and done a very thoughtful job" in response to concerns raised by executive branch agencies and Senate conferees.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: buyamerica; buyamerican; dod

1 posted on 10/02/2003 9:00:19 PM PDT by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
With a wink and a nod this bill dies. Business as usual, nothing's changed.
2 posted on 10/02/2003 9:07:50 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I'M BACK!!!

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com


STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD (It's in the Breaking News sidebar!)

3 posted on 10/02/2003 9:09:22 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
I must confess ignorance on this, and what's posted here hardly clears things up.
Can you provide a link to some background?

Although if I had to guess, I'd say that Colon Powell would be adamantly opposed to any "buy American" requirement - or any other pro-American position, for that matter.
4 posted on 10/02/2003 9:54:57 PM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
Lawmaker predicts defeat for 'Buy American' language (Defense Department procurement update) is an earlier article I posted on it.
5 posted on 10/02/2003 9:56:55 PM PDT by chance33_98 (This tagline made from recycled ideas, no animals were harmed during the typing of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
NOTHING purchased by the armed forces of America should have ANYTHING not produced IN America in it.

Certain strategic components/minerals should be bought "out of country" and warehoused to maximize the store available for when they become less available on the market, both to increase availability here, and to deny them to the enemy.

I could go on, but I'm not even an American............
6 posted on 10/02/2003 10:40:09 PM PDT by Don W (Lead, follow, or get outta the way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Good work.

Can't buy American because we don't make anything anymore.
7 posted on 10/02/2003 11:18:35 PM PDT by ido_now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Did you know that France makes the airplane tires for our military jets? FRANCE? Nothing like our own government endangering our sovereignty.
8 posted on 10/02/2003 11:19:06 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Just another "Screw-America and Americans" item to remind the voters of come 2004. Seems these idiots really don't remember who they work for. Guess they hope their pandering to the illegal-aliens will get them reelected. Lots of political whores will be looking for new johns soon enough.
9 posted on 10/03/2003 3:30:01 AM PDT by JustAnAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnAmerican
Seems these idiots really don't remember who they work for.

You must of missed the memo: you're a serf on their land. Now get back to work.
10 posted on 10/03/2003 7:53:29 AM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson