Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WMD: Blair was right
The Online Sun (United Kingdom) ^ | Thursday, October 2, 2003 | TREVOR KAVANAGH

Posted on 10/02/2003 8:01:55 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree

WMD: Blair was right

WMD threat ... Iraq negotiated with North Korea

By TREVOR KAVANAGH Political Editor

A TERRIFYING new probe yesterday revealed Saddam Hussein WAS secretly preparing for chemical, biological and even nuclear war.

The 13-page document, compiled from the reports of 1,200 arms experts who have been scouring Iraq for two months, says Saddam was determined to resume building nukes.

And he was already negotiating with rogue state North Korea to buy long-range rockets that could have launched nuclear AND chemical warheads at UK bases in the Med.

The experts also unearthed secret bio-weapons labs, new strains of lethal diseases, a deadly bug hidden in a scientist’s home — and evidence of possible chemical weapon tests on human victims.

The report, from America’s Iraq Survey Group, totally vindicates Tony Blair’s decision to go to war over WMDs.

ISG chief Dr David Kay says in the report: “We have discovered dozens of WMD-related programme activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the UN.”

Dr Kay’s full report — revealed to US congressmen yesterday — is still top secret.

Vindicated ... Tony Blair But last night Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said: “It has produced conclusive and incontrovertible evidence that Iraq was in material breach of UN Resolution 1441.”

In his report, Dr Kay admits no actual weapons of mass destruction have yet been found.

But he points out that his experts from America, Britain and Australia have faced a campaign of sabotage, looting, and obstruction — and have been subjected to bombings, firefights and threats.

Nevertheless, they have proved Saddam was planning to acquire long-range missiles, possibly nuclear-tipped.

These missiles could have hit UK bases in Cyprus, Turkey and Cairo — as The Sun revealed in September.

Dr Kay says: “There were plans and advanced design work for new long range missiles with ranges up to at least 1,000km — well beyond the 150km limit set by the UN.”

The experts found evidence of “clandestine attempts” between late 1999 and 2002 to get from North Korea technology related to its 1300km No Dong missiles.

Saddam ... making secret plans Chillingly, they also unearthed documents and equipment concealed in scientists’ homes for “resuming uranium enrichment” — a key stage in the making of nukes.

And Iraqi scientists interviewed by the ISG team confirmed Saddam was determined to develop them.

Dr Kay, a former UN weapons inspector credited with dismantling Saddam’s nuclear programme in the 1990s, says: “They have told us Saddam remained firmly committed to acquiring nuclear weapons.

“At least one senior Iraqi official believed, by 2000, Saddam had run out of patience with waiting for sanctions to end and wanted to restart the nuclear programme.”

ISG experts found a vial of “live” botulism hidden in an Iraqi scientist’s home — and fear others are still at large.

Dr Kay’s report says: “The scientist who concealed the vial has identified a large cache of agents that he was asked, but refused, to conceal. The group is searching for the second cache. One ex-biological weapons scientist confirmed a production line could be switched to produce anthrax in a week.”

The report also highlights a “network of labs and safehouses” containing equipment suitable for chemical and biological weapons research.

And it found evidence of a “prison laboratory complex, possibly used in human testing of biological weapon agents” — again explicitly concealed from the UN.

The experts also uncovered “new research” on deadly viruses Brucella, Congo Crimean Haemorrhagic Fever, ricin and aflatoxin.

Warning ... Sun, Sept 2002 The report says other members of the team discovered a “covert capability” to make fuel propellant useful ONLY for banned Scud missiles. Dr Kay says the hunt was hampered by Iraqi obstruction, secrecy and sabotage.

He adds: “Looting destroyed important evidence of Iraq’s WMD programme. This was deliberate. Some personnel crossed borders before and during the conflict and may have taken evidence and weapons-related material.

“Even the bulkiest materials we are searching for can be concealed in spaces not much larger than a two-car garage.”

Dr Kay said that the ISG team also had the monumental task of examining Iraq’s huge conventional weapons caches. So far only ten of 130 have been rigorously searched.

He said the nuclear programme appeared to be in its early stages, adding: “The evidence we found will suggest a very tentative restart at the very most rudimentary level.”

Downing Street last night hailed Dr Kay’s interim report as dramatic evidence of Saddam’s lies.

And a top security source said last night: “This is just the tip of the iceberg.”

Last night the Ministry of Defence said the vial of botulism found in the Iraqi scientist’s home could have been “weaponised” within 48 hours.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dithering UN did not want to know Commentary by TREVOR KAVANAGH

WHAT is most surprising about the damning new evidence against Saddam Hussein is that it should come as a surprise at all.

There was ample proof long before America and Britain went to war that Saddam was spoiling for a fight. The dithering UN just didn’t want to know.

What must shock even those like French President Jacques Chirac, who led the crusade to stop us invading, is his terrifying pursuit of nukes.

Dr David Kay’s report, certain to be howled down by the conspiracy-obsessed anti-war brigade, does more than justify ousting Saddam.

It proves beyond doubt that it was a virtuous act for which the world should be truly grateful.

WMD proof ... David Kay We now know this tyrant had “run out of patience” and was determined to make Iraq the Arab world’s nuclear power. Uranium enrichment was planned and a supply of ballistic missiles capable of delivering warheads as far away as Cairo, Turkey — and Israel — was being teed-up with North Korea.

Iraq and North Korea are countries controversially but correctly identified by President George Bush as the “Axis of Evil”.

That axis includes Iran which is now trying to build nuclear power stations and has warned it might one day use nukes against Israel.

Saudi Arabia is slyly trying to obtain nukes from Pakistan. Egypt wants a nuclear powered desalination plant. The risk of anti-Western regimes going nuclear is too horrifying to contemplate.

That risk has been substantially reduced by the salutary demonstration of America’s — and Britain’s — display of resolution and military might.

Left to the tender care of the limp-wristed UN, Saddam would have continued to develop WMDs.

And one day, without a shadow of a doubt, he would have used them — to devastating effect on world peace.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blair; saddam; weapons; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Coop
Read the entire article, not just the one line that sends you into orgasm.

You mean like those including yourself over the impending Kay report? How shattering it must be for the truth of no evidence to smack you in the face instead of what the administration told you was the truth

41 posted on 10/03/2003 6:17:15 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
Local and national media outlets need to see this...pronto!
42 posted on 10/03/2003 6:23:09 AM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow ("The board is set. The pieces are moving. We come to it at last...the Great Battle of our time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
The President on TV with Bernard Kerik.

New Yawk's finest!

Now we drop our WMD on Iraq.

43 posted on 10/03/2003 6:25:28 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
bump for later reading
44 posted on 10/03/2003 6:25:50 AM PDT by boxerblues (God Bless the 101st, stay safe, stay armed and watch your backs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
How shattering it must be for the truth of no evidence

Not even Terry McAuliffe could have read the above article and then stated something so ridiculous.

Boys and girls, this is what is known as a LIE.

45 posted on 10/03/2003 6:27:22 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Since Karen Hughes and Ari Fleischer left, the media team has been like a goat rodeo.

LOL - (do they actually have those?)

46 posted on 10/03/2003 6:27:53 AM PDT by jla (http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
GREAT POST
47 posted on 10/03/2003 6:31:17 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Boys and girls, this is what is known as a LIE.

How is it a lie? Kay produced no evidence. Do you know something the rest of us don't sunshine?

48 posted on 10/03/2003 6:39:17 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Testimony under oath is evidence.
49 posted on 10/03/2003 7:12:24 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
As if that's stopped others from committing perjury in past administration scandals
50 posted on 10/03/2003 7:18:51 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Just so I don't have to repeat your work, please post a thread or website that has a succinct listing of the administration's lies, as you see them, concerning Iraq's WMD. Thanks.
51 posted on 10/03/2003 7:36:15 AM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: billbears
How is it a lie? Kay produced no evidence.

He produced a TON of evidence. No matter how many times you dismiss it.

52 posted on 10/03/2003 7:40:51 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
I think pratically every Kay thread defending a statement of 'no found WMD' admission as actual admission of WMDs existing should work. And lie is too strong of a word IMO. I don't think Bush lied. I think he restated what he was told.
53 posted on 10/03/2003 7:43:07 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Coop
He produced a TON of evidence.

Kay was not expected to produce any solid evidence that chemical or biological weapons had been found, sources have said previously

Must have been in gaseous form then huh? Kay admitted to have found nothing

54 posted on 10/03/2003 7:48:45 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Kay claims to have evidence of attempts to acquire missile technology from N. Korea. We have no way to disprove that Kay has such evidence.
55 posted on 10/03/2003 7:55:14 AM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: billbears
A TON of evidence. Unlike you, chirping away what the media tells you, I actually try to read the reports. http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/speeches/2003/david_kay_10022003.html

A TON of evidence.

56 posted on 10/03/2003 8:00:21 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!
57 posted on 10/03/2003 8:13:31 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Coop
From your link:

We have not yet found stocks of weapons, but we are not yet at the point where we can say definitively either that such weapon stocks do not exist or that they existed before the war and our only task is to find where they have gone.

No stocks, no evidence. We're not talking about 'programs'. That line just doesn't fly. Either WMDs existed or they didn't. And perhaps if you'd quit listening to what the RNC and President wants you to use as talking points, you'd see the evidence just isn't what it was promised to be

58 posted on 10/03/2003 8:14:19 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Either WMDs existed

And they did. Period.

They were used at Halabja, used in the Iran/Iraq war, and their destruction during Desert Storm apparently led to illness among our soldiers. There's a even a nice vial of BW agent at a scientist's home for you, although of course you'll claim it was only for humanitarian purposes.

I admire your pathetic perseverance. Keep on trying!

59 posted on 10/03/2003 8:20:02 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Coop
They were used at Halabja, used in the Iran/Iraq war

Of course they were. The US at the time turned its eye (a more deadly form the lesser of two evils crap you CINOs always preach) back in the 1980s, I've never denied this. However in the 1980s, the 1990s, and even today Iraq did not present a direct and immediate threat to the borders of this nation. But as I said, you keep it up, we need a few blind Republicans to parrot the blind loyal Democrats from a few years back I imagine you so gleefully laughed at.

The WMDs were not there, Kay as much said so in his report. But now his report wasn't really, really finished was it? yeah that's the ticket...

60 posted on 10/03/2003 8:33:03 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson