Hijackers In Same Hotel As Saudi Minister (9-10-2001)

The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 10-3-2003 | David Rennie

[swarthyguy]

And people ask me why I think the Tragic Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, a sovereign state, is responsible for attacking us on Black Tuesday?

Nice job keeping this info covered up for so long.

Of course, he's only one minister, no proof of official Saudi policy, oil, geopolitics, the alternative is worse - blah blah blah.

The alternative should have been the destruction of wahhabism, devolving the Holy Places to Jordan or an Vatican like state run by a consortium of Muslim nations, and the nullification of the Royals.

Again, a newslead item nowhere to be seen on the screens of our intrepid TV "news" hounds.

[swarthyguy]

then he was there to give them their final send off from allah ... his appointment a few months later is no big surprise, given all the data ...

Yes, the final blessing for doing allah's work.

[swarthyguy]

How they get it?

why?

Perhaps no US media outfit would take it. Or as per your next post, the US did not want this info released.

I mean, wouldn't want to give the impression that the Saudis are anything but our friends.

Imagine if this info had come out in late September 2001. And the names and connections of all the other Saudis, including the binladins.

Would the American people have demanded the Saudis head?

[Cindy]

WASHINGTON TIMES.com (AP): "SAUDI ARABIA IS HIRING LAWYERS TO REPRESENT ITS TERROR SUSPECTS" (October 19, 2003) (Read More...)

CNN.com - Law Center: "SAUDI PRINCES SEEK IMMUNITY AGAINST 9/11 LAWSUITS" (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Lawyers representing two Saudi princes argued Friday that their clients have immunity from lawsuits relating to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, because they are diplomatic officials.") (October 17, 2003) (Read More...)

SEPTEMBER 11, 2001: ATTACK ON AMERICA! (UPDATED DAILY.) (Read More...)

[Dog]

WTH?

[Allan]

Bump

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the heads up!