To: Peach
Yesterday you *finally* admitted Iraq had WMD but they didn't constitute a threat.And I never said otherwise. I freely admit they had them in the 1980s. That has always been my position. But for Bush to state the levels he did in his SOTU address was farcical
19 posted on
10/02/2003 12:29:07 PM PDT by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: billbears
Yesterday when I told you that it's gratifying to see you finally admit they had WMD, you just changed the subject, as usual.
The levels that Bush stated in his SOTU are the levels that have been used for over 17 UN resolutions, and by every nation in the world that has intelligence agencies.
You claim you admit (now) they had WMD in the 80's. How big of you, considering they used them repeatedly.
You have yet to admit they had them in the 90's and yet to tell us where you think they are now.
22 posted on
10/02/2003 12:33:33 PM PDT by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: billbears
I freely admit they had them in the 1980s. That being said, there has been no evidence of 30,000 munitions or anything else Bush outlined in his speeches building up to the war. So what do you think they had recently? Nothing? A lesser amount? No idea?
27 posted on
10/02/2003 12:44:09 PM PDT by
lasereye
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson