Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

L.A.Times: Schwarzeneggar Groped Hollywood Women
Reuters.com ^ | Oct 2,2003 | Reuters

Posted on 10/02/2003 5:44:45 AM PDT by foolscap

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: foolscap
Hmm... Women groped? And... in California, of all places.

I'm just so... whelmed.
21 posted on 10/02/2003 5:54:30 AM PDT by Ramius (--> Post No Bills <--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
THIS is the October surprise? NOT...tell us something we didn't know..... Besides, I didn't hear him lie and say he didn't do it, instead he admitted his previous life was more Hollywood wild, but not as wild as some might think...After clintoon this is nothing.....
22 posted on 10/02/2003 5:54:35 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
"We believe Democrats and others are using this to try to hurt Arnold Schwarzenegger's campaign," Walsh said. "We believe that this is coming so close before the election, something that discourages good, hard-working, decent people from running for office."

The Times did not learn of any of the six women from Schwarzenegger's rivals in the recall race, and none of the women approached the newspaper on her own. Reporters contacted them in the course of a six-week examination of Schwarzenegger's behavior toward women on and off the movie set.

Parsing can be fun, kids!

23 posted on 10/02/2003 5:56:01 AM PDT by freedomlover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TrappedInLiberalHell
ACK!!!!

Coffee on the keyboard again.

Go to your room and take your rubber duckie!
24 posted on 10/02/2003 5:57:02 AM PDT by Ronin (When the fox gnaws -- smile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xzins
That is precisely WHY the LA Times printed this article - to get some people frightened enough to switch to McClintock or vote no on the recall, take away votes from Arnold, and voila - the Times helps to keep their beloved Gray Davis in office. I hope smart Republican voters know a Dem smear tactic when they see it - apparently it's fooled some people already.
25 posted on 10/02/2003 5:57:10 AM PDT by Moonmad27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Toespi
Isn't that what they said about Clinton?
26 posted on 10/02/2003 5:57:18 AM PDT by BUCKSBUD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
Sounds Clintonesque. Why would the LA Slimes publish this to help Arnold with the left???
27 posted on 10/02/2003 5:57:58 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
I agree, if this is the best the LA Times can find to go after him with it is pretty lame

I don't know. The gay-friendly vote in the Bay Area is quite substantial. They are not going to be happy with these allegations. I think they might, they just might, vote no on the recall after all this ...

28 posted on 10/02/2003 5:58:52 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
The Times did not learn of any of the six women from Schwarzenegger's rivals in the recall race, and none of the women approached the newspaper on her own. Reporters contacted them in the course of a six-week examination of Schwarzenegger's behavior toward women on and off the movie set.



So, how did the reporters know to contact these women? Obviously someone told them. What a crock!
29 posted on 10/02/2003 5:59:10 AM PDT by SONbrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
I don't believe their disclaimer. What with this expose five days before the election, it sounds too good to be true. And none of the allegations the Los Angeles Times report cites can be verified. Its one big smear job.
30 posted on 10/02/2003 5:59:28 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
So the LALA Times went out on their own and dug this up. I think the LALA Times has stepped in it here. By my reading, this clearly demonstrates that the Times is a mouthpiece of the California democRAT party.

No offense (really), but did you recently find yourself ejected from a vehicle transporting turnips? ;)

31 posted on 10/02/2003 5:59:51 AM PDT by freedomlover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Hmm... Women groped? And... in California, of all places.

But these were women, Hollywood women, like in stars, and he actually touched them. The boys in the bay are not going to be happy. I think this is going to cost Arnold substantial support in the liberal community.

32 posted on 10/02/2003 6:01:15 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Moonmad27
Better to have another horse in the race.

Heres a true point, MM27, and you can weigh it. Arnold knows what's in his closet. He should go to Repub headquartes in Calif. and level with them about what COULD come out. If they think it's enough to stampede the people, then he should be advised to drop out.

For any deadly accusation to have effect, it will have to be public no later than Saturday so it can make the Sunday talk shows.

Like it or not, it is reassuring to have McClintock still there.
33 posted on 10/02/2003 6:01:21 AM PDT by xzins (And now I will show you the most excellent way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: xzins
It appears that those incensed with Bill Clinton's policies and behaviors are prepared to vote Bill Schwarzengeggar into office.

It's absolutely fascinating.

Yes it is. Sad as well.

34 posted on 10/02/2003 6:02:39 AM PDT by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: freedomlover
"The Times did not learn of any of the six women from Schwarzenegger's rivals in the recall race, and none of the women approached the newspaper on her own"

They admit someone feed them the story...

Who directed the Times to the women..

35 posted on 10/02/2003 6:02:53 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
It's only about sex. It's his personal life.

Isn't that the Rats mantra?
36 posted on 10/02/2003 6:03:20 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
I see why the left is having a problem with this, at no time did he tell them " you better put some ice on that"
37 posted on 10/02/2003 6:04:22 AM PDT by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
Reporters contacted them in the course of a six-week examination of Schwarzenegger's behavior toward women on and off the movie set.

So in a six week effort, reporters (note the plural) found six women to make a claim. But the women are not named. Nor did these women file a report with police. Nor were there witnesses. No details on WHEN this occurred (starting in 1980, the article states). And no details from most of the women, just a one line from one unnamed woman (did the others enjoy it? Hope for a part in a movie?)

This McClintock supporter thinks that this is weak. Consider the source too: LAme TIMES

38 posted on 10/02/2003 6:04:41 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
This goes beyone sex........this story was feed to the Times they flat out admit it......see my post 35.
39 posted on 10/02/2003 6:04:44 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: tort_feasor

Be real. Davis is a Schwarzenegger rival. FACE REALITY.

Your man is a lying groper who should remind you of BJ Clinton. Personally, I hope the Dems have a Paula Jones all lined up to slap Arnold around. If he did the deed, FACE THE MUSIC. You've been warned repeatedly not to vote for low lifes -- even if they are celebrities.
40 posted on 10/02/2003 6:04:54 AM PDT by sruleoflaw ((FOR TOM MCCLINTOCK: Arnold will get my vote when hell freezes over and pigs fly))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson