To: Pukin Dog
A newspapers wouldn't publish allegations such as this, as the could be sued for libel and defamation of character. There is some strong evidence or some part of this that will immunize them from a libel lawsuit.
To: Lurkd Long Enough
Exactly.
195 posted on
10/01/2003 11:27:58 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: Lurkd Long Enough
Tell that to the NY Times. If they were brought a false story, they are covered. If their report only says that Limbaugh is under investigation, then they are covered. They are not calling Rush an addict, they are reporting an accusation. In court, Rush would lose.
197 posted on
10/01/2003 11:28:38 PM PDT by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Lurkd Long Enough
A newspapers wouldn't publish allegations such as this, as the could be sued for libel and defamation of character. There is some strong evidence or some part of this that will immunize them from a libel lawsuitThe newspaper cannot get into trouble. They are just reporting the allegations, true or not
204 posted on
10/01/2003 11:30:46 PM PDT by
GeronL
(The War is not the Presidents hobby!)
To: Lurkd Long Enough
A newspapers wouldn't publish allegations such as this, as the could be sued for libel and defamation of character. There is some strong evidence or some part of this that will immunize them from a libel lawsuit.HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
235 posted on
10/01/2003 11:35:56 PM PDT by
Fledermaus
(What's the point anymore?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson