Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Almondjoy
if you want to bank it on stats you might as well compare him to Jeff Blake

OK

Blake's 2 best years (95-96)

7446 yds - 52 TD - 31 Ints - 626 rushing yds - 4 rushing TDS - Avg rating 81.2

McNabb's "MVP" years (00-01)

6598 yds - 46 TD - 26 Ints - 1111 rushing yds - 8 rushing TDs - Avg rating 81.05

Looks like a wash to me - and I don't remember Blake ever being talked about as the second coming.

208 posted on 10/02/2003 6:16:27 PM PDT by gore_sux (and so does Xlinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: gore_sux
Because he didn't win games..... Simple as that. Plus Blake has been medicore since then.. but he still starts. McNabb on the other hand is just maturing. McNabb also doesn't have any weapons on offense. A horrible running game and average receivers. Reid even acknowledged that they needed to take heat off of McNabb with a better running game. They established some of that in their game 3, which by the way they won 23-13. They will continue their "comeback" this week against Washington with a nice pounding of the Skins.
212 posted on 10/03/2003 9:01:54 AM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson