My simple question, can't be that hard to understand. Now for a third time, I quote you:
Well, the plain fact is that the LP is organizing and effort aimed at gaining majority political influence in a small state. Its strategy is to get "their people" to move into said state, for that express purpose.(from your reply #27)
...but in fact the LP is trying...(from your reply #40)
And My question, again for a third time:
Can you support this with a reference? Or do you just make up any story to fit your fantasy?
The question is quite simple. Can you reference that the "LP" is organizing this project? Or do you just make up what ever you want about the LP and state it as a fact?
Ahhhh -- so finally you ask the question you meant to ask, and not the one I was answering. OK, then. In the future, maybe you can ask the proper question the first time?
Can you reference that the "LP" is organizing this project? Or do you just make up what ever you want about the LP and state it as a fact?
Actually, I'm just assuming that, based on the fact that it's always billed (see FR posts on it) as a "libertarian initiative," and the fact the Libertarian Party spokesmen are generally quoted in the articles.
In this article, for example, the chairman of the New Hampshire Libertarian Party refers to the FSP as something "we" are doing, and the LP seems to endorse the idea.
I'm no doubt glossing over the subtleties of who's actually sponsoring it, though the LP is clearly a major player (two of FSP's leadership team are LP members). It's a matter of some indifference to me, however, whether we're talking about 'L' or 'l' ibertarians.
Pretty much the only point I'm making on this thread is that the head of the NH LP was not telling the truth about "invade and take over."