In my reply #63, I did not quote you on your use, or anyone else's use of the words "invade and take over." Nor did I say anything about those words or their meaning. I have no opinion on this figure of speech that seems to have varying interpretations, and varying degrees of accuracy. I say "seems" because I really don't have any thoughts on the topic.
What I did quote you on, and I quote again:
Well, the plain fact is that the LP is organizing and effort aimed at gaining majority political influence in a small state. Its strategy is to get "their people" to move into said state, for that express purpose.(from your reply #27)
...but in fact the LP is trying...(from your reply #40)
Note: the quotes from you do contain the words "invade and take over." What the two quotes from you have in common is that they both state that "LP" is trying or is organizing such and such. As I asked in reply #63, I ask again now:
Can you support this with a reference? Or do you just make up any story to fit your fantasy?
Perhaps you need to read the article and thread so that you can gain a sense of context?
The head of the NH Libertarian Party used the words "invade and take over."
The clearly stated goal of the FSP (somebody provided a link to the site, above) is to a) get a bunch of libertarians to move to NH, and to basically enact the LP platform. The article says the same thing.
The terms "invade and take over," seem to be a rather fitting description of this project, and the "references" are right in front of your eyes.
This is not difficult stuff, jack.