To: Sabertooth
They probably just considered the sample too small to do a cross-tab for Blacks or Asians. With such small numbers of each, the results would be virtually meaningless.
To: The Old Hoosier
They probably just considered the sample too small to do a cross-tab for Blacks or Asians. With such small numbers of each, the results would be virtually meaningless. Much ado about nothing...... They had to do an additional survey sample and add to the overall poll to get 137 Latinos in the mix which for the Latinos specifically has a MOE of 8. They had to add Latinos in their last poll also.
An additional random sample of the state was also surveyed* over the same period and added to the sample which brought the total number of Latino likely voters in the survey to 137. The entire sample of adults was weighted slightly to conform with census figures for sex, race, age and education as well as to registration figures provided by the secretary of state. The margin of sampling error for likely voters is 3 percentage points in either direction; among Latinos it is 8 points.
24 posted on
10/01/2003 10:50:28 AM PDT by
deport
(Why does McClintock think he's entitled to the Governor's Office?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson