[Tauzero]

" You have to be kidding."

No, I'm not.

"He would be completely opposed to the federal government restricting businesses from hiring whom they choose, simply to prop up the wages of a privileged few (and at the expense of everyone else)."

He would merely point out some of the undesirable unintended consequences of such an action, and that in the aggregate there is a net economic loss.

What he never says is that the net economic loss is sufficient grounds for rejecting such a policy.

[Texas_Dawg]

What he never says is that the net economic loss is sufficient grounds for rejecting such a policy.

OK. Point taken.