To: Texas_Dawg
" You have to be kidding."
No, I'm not.
"He would be completely opposed to the federal government restricting businesses from hiring whom they choose, simply to prop up the wages of a privileged few (and at the expense of everyone else)."
He would merely point out some of the undesirable unintended consequences of such an action, and that in the aggregate there is a net economic loss.
What he never says is that the net economic loss is sufficient grounds for rejecting such a policy.
413 posted on
10/01/2003 3:21:11 PM PDT by
Tauzero
(Avoid loose hair styles. When government offices burn, long hair sometimes catches on fire.)
To: Tauzero
What he never says is that the net economic loss is sufficient grounds for rejecting such a policy. OK. Point taken.
414 posted on
10/01/2003 3:23:28 PM PDT by
Texas_Dawg
(You're trying hard not to show it... but, baby... believe me... I know it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson