Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
The timing of this has nothng at all to do with the CIA scandal.
6 posted on 10/01/2003 8:47:11 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
You think the capture of Alamoud was planned just to counter the CIA thing?
19 posted on 10/01/2003 9:03:53 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: js1138
The timing of this has nothng at all to do with the CIA scandal.

I would say it this way:

The timing of the CIA scandal has nothing at all to do with this.

20 posted on 10/01/2003 9:04:18 AM PDT by StriperSniper (The slippery slope is getting steeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: js1138
Several freepers were asking why the leak story was re-released at that time--what was it supposed to deflect attention from. I guessed Hillary announcing she would run for president, so I got half of it right. I know, it's not much of anything to brag about the fact I figured Hillary was probably involved in the orchestrated media frenzy. She isn't going to want her Jewish supporters to be reminded of her Muslim extremist supporters.
21 posted on 10/01/2003 9:06:06 AM PDT by Reb Raider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: js1138
Good point. Pretty Orwellian no? Trump up a leak scandal that will dominate the news cycle for two weeks on the day before a Clinton appointee is arrested for furthering a terrorist enterprise.
75 posted on 10/01/2003 1:22:58 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson