To: RoughDobermann
Does anyone else find it interesting that cyclist attire keeps coming up, typically along with "homo" this and that? Obviously, some here are allowing their deeply repressed homosexual tendencies to bubble to the surface. I'll keep that in mind next time some a-hole tries to knock me off my bike... Well, they don't understand that the tight elastic shorts are for more than show. You don't want loose shorts or pants chafing your legs on a long ride. They also help keep the old jewels in place - having them constantly swing from side to side can get very annoying.
321 posted on
10/01/2003 9:02:02 AM PDT by
Hacksaw
To: Hacksaw
Not to mention that skin tight clothes are somewhat better at cutting throught the enemy (the wind) than, say, overalls...
324 posted on
10/01/2003 9:05:02 AM PDT by
RoughDobermann
(Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
To: Hacksaw
"They also help keep the old jewels in place - having them constantly swing from side to side can get very annoying."Bicyclists don't have "jewels". Their girlie-men, remember? And you'll have a better chance of finding any doodads at a Catch and Release Elk Hunt!
329 posted on
10/01/2003 9:09:17 AM PDT by
Hatteras
(Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson