To: xzins
The counter to Fuhrman sounds a lot more like an anti-abortion argument than an anti-death penalty argument.
The anti-death-penalty argument is simple, to me. What government can really be trusted with the power to put its citizens to death? A government which believes it can put a citizen to death in one situation will find a way to justify doing the same in a different situation (e.g. the Waco catastrophe).
41 posted on
10/01/2003 7:37:03 AM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Right Wing Crazy #5338526)
To: thoughtomator
Abortion is an illegitimate devaluation of human life that creates apathy about the value of life.
So does refusing to uphold a standard of equal or greater compensation for the taking of a life. As life is cheapened more will apathetically take life. In the long run their taking of the life will pay off for them.
45 posted on
10/01/2003 7:43:35 AM PDT by
xzins
(And now I will show you the most excellent way!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson