Ex-Clinton staffer loses Top Secret clearance

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, October 1, 2003 | By Paul Sperry

[Miss Marple]

The problem with this is that they aren't appointees any more. Clinton began moving loyalists into Civil Service positions in early 2000. Once hired as Civil Service employees, they cannot be fired simply because they are Clinton loyalists.

You have to root them out and catch them in something like this, one person at a time.

This is a real problem in ALL the departments. It is the source of the leaks and rumors at the Pentagon and at State. Ashcroft did some fancy re-assigning in 2002 and has these folks fairly isolated. However, CIA obviously still has Clinton people there (like the odious Valeria Plame) and I am sure there are many more.

I am also sure they are being investigated quietly and watched so that anything at all untoward will give an excuse to get rid of them, like this person.

[mountaineer]

I am also sure they are being investigated quietly and watched so that anything at all untoward will give an excuse to get rid of them, like this person.

I certainly hope so!

[petitfour]

Why do you say this:However, CIA obviously still has Clinton people there (like the odious Valeria Plame) ???? I haven't heard a word from her, and I am reluctant to call her a Clinton person. When did she join the CIA? If she trained with Larry Johnson (if he is telling the truth), then she joined up in the mid 1980s. I would call her a Reagan person based on that alone. So she married a guy who runs his mouth too much and leans left. So did Mary Matalin. As for this ex-Clinton staffer and her HUGE whoppers on her resume, this should be really big news. Clinton's webmaster was compromised from the get-go. I think she was put into her position on purpose. She was blackmailable. She was controllable. And she was a great possible fall girl if needed. This is quite scandalous!