Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
There's another way a much easier way that would envolve direct intervention from Arnold's cabinet. Unlike the refferendum which is actually a movement based on the will of the people which Tom would like to take credit for.

The refferendum can go ahead with or without Tom and Tom does not need to be governor to get the refferendum pushed through. So stop worshipping false prophets wil ya.
63 posted on 09/30/2003 8:45:47 PM PDT by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Tempest
There's another way a much easier way that would envolve direct intervention from Arnold's cabinet.

First, and please learn to spell and write in standard English beyond a fifth grade level. Thank you.

Arnold has not proposed such action. It would be illegal under California law. Are you suggesting that Arnold will violate his oath of office to uphold the laws of the State?

The refferendum can go ahead with or without Tom and Tom does not need to be governor to get the refferendum pushed through. So stop worshipping false prophets wil ya.

Sure it can, but with Arnold against it, the effort will be more difficult.

So, why is he against it? Why does Arnold propose to work through a legislature that has NO intention of heeding him?

He doesn't. He's lying.

66 posted on 09/30/2003 8:58:29 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (California! See how low WE can go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson