Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shermy
If the article weren't accurate about her being an undercover Directorate of Opeations operative, I don't think Albert Gonzales would be so interested in evidence of White House employees' contacts with these two reporters.
12 posted on 09/30/2003 4:56:39 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides
If the article weren't accurate about her being an undercover Directorate of Opeations operative, I don't think Albert Gonzales would be so interested in evidence of White House employees' contacts with these two reporters.

Yep.

And this "senior intelligence official" has some 'splaining to do.

"We paid his [Wilson's] air fare. But to go to Niger is not exactly a benefit. Most people you'd have to pay big bucks to go there," the senior intelligence official said. Wilson said he was reimbursed only for expenses.

So why was Mr. Wilson eager to go there? Did he have an agenda? Before recently I assumed the Niger Letter Story was a fraud, but if not, no big deal in the major scheme of things anyway. Now I read he didn't debunk it, he just cast doubt that uranium was actually bought. He parsed his words.

23 posted on 09/30/2003 5:06:31 PM PDT by Shermy (Defend The Right To Claim My Dissent Is Censored By Your Disagreement!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: aristeides
Gonzales is interested in the evidence because someone has asked for it...now we have posters on FR who are willing to translate cooperation with the Justice Department into an admission of guilt?

Get a grip...when did Clinton ever actually cooperate with any probes that he wasn't conducting himself?
28 posted on 09/30/2003 5:18:55 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: aristeides
I don't think Albert Gonzales would be so interested in evidence of White House employees' contacts with these two reporters.

Isn't he responding to the specific inquiry of the letter he received? And I don't see proof of anything here, if such a grave outing had taken place why days later would senior intelligence officials further endanger her by offering that Plame worked on weapons of mass destruction issues? (As written in the linked Newsday article.) Of course the same article says that Wilson claims that the Bush administration was trying to intimidate him and others by using her maiden name. (He, in his on-line biography, lists her maiden name.)

People were reacting to Wilson's op-ed piece where he seemed to assert that his visit was the complete and final history of Saddam and uranium. I'm still betting that Plame's name came up first as part of a sour grape explanation of why Wilson got an assignment that he was neither fit to fill or made expert on by his single visit.

56 posted on 09/30/2003 6:04:50 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson