Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 91B
100% right on. Clausewitz also talked about the size of armies--his conclusion was to always take the biggest force you can get. We are already paying the price in Afghanistan and Iraq for going in too light--couldn't stop the Taliban & Al Qaeda from escaping, couldn't pin them down on ANACONDA, and now they have set up bases in Pakistan & remote provinces & have resupplied & gained confidence & learned some new tactics.

In Iraq, our ground troop shortages meant we couldn't secure the military bases and munitions dumps & key infrastructure & put the hammer down in Tikrit & Fallujah from the get go. So the bad guys easily re-grouped, got their supplies, attained some early successes & have been given the opportunity to plan, rehearse, and adapt.

In both cases, if we hit with all we had at the beginning, there would have been no chance to adapt & re-group & get away & realize--hey! we can take the Americans!

We will win--but it will take longer than it should have & cost more lives & $ because we had a SECDEF who doesn't understand land warfare and doesn't listen to those who do.

3 posted on 09/30/2003 4:43:41 PM PDT by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mark502inf
"We will win--but it will take longer than it should have & cost more lives & $ because we had a SECDEF who doesn't understand land warfare and doesn't listen to those who do."

That bear repeating my screaming eagle friend. I am posting from Camp As Saliyah in beautiful Doha, Qatar. Yourself?

5 posted on 09/30/2003 4:49:28 PM PDT by 91B (Golly it's hot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson