Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland
Hmmm, let me see if I understand. All the current indicators suggest that, contrary to what the "McClintock-is-great-but-can't-win-so-vote-for-Arnold" hysterical voices have been screaming, McClintock's candidacy isn't going to prevent Arnold from winning. I guess that means that the residual hatred of McClintock, as articulated in this piece, comes from some sort of weird sour grapes mentality that is determined to punish McClintock for NOT having made the doomsday prediction come true, thereby showing that these naysayers didn't really know what they were talking about.

Yep, that's worth ostracizing a genuine conservative candidate over.

81 posted on 09/30/2003 4:30:20 PM PDT by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: william clark
There is no residual hatred of McClintock in this piece. Get the chip off your shoulder.
82 posted on 09/30/2003 4:34:35 PM PDT by doug from upland (Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson