Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oh Canada: Explaining Canadian Silence (The lotus-eaters of the True North)
National Review ^ | September 30, 2003 | ‘David Frum’s Diary’

Posted on 09/30/2003 1:36:10 PM PDT by quidnunc

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: quidnunc
I suspect that what Canadians say to Americans' faces
and what they say behind their backs
is quite different

What you suspect is true.

21 posted on 10/01/2003 7:30:16 AM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BushisTheMan
Young women walk home from college night classes without fear of mugging.

On the campus of the college where I teach
(in Ontario)
several women have been mugged, raped and one was murdered.

22 posted on 10/01/2003 7:37:02 AM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BushisTheMan
I'd be curious to know the name of the reporter and the newspaper.

The views he expresses probably are shared by most of the reporters in Canada.

23 posted on 10/01/2003 7:38:31 AM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
You forgot about the "Canada clause" of the US constitution, wherein Canadian provinces can bypass the normal process for becoming States. British Columbia threatened to invoke it in the 1860s to gain leverage for the construction of a transcontinental railway.

Uhhh ... pointer please?

24 posted on 10/01/2003 10:56:17 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Sorry, I'm going from memory here- IIRC in a thread here about the Alberta separatist movement it was mentioned by another FReeper that the Framers, who desired and expected the Canadian provinces (the English-speaking ones) to join the Union eventually, included a clause in the Constitution to make it easier to admit the provinces. Serves me right for depending on secondhand info- perhaps another FReeper could confirm this, or at least point me to an online source of the original text of the Constitution before I shoot my mouth off again :~
25 posted on 10/01/2003 12:51:55 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Earth first! We can mine the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Allan
The views he expresses probably are shared by most of the reporters in Canada.

Exactly. These views are ubiquitous among the media, academia and the civil service but generally not shared on the street.

26 posted on 10/01/2003 12:54:54 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Earth first! We can mine the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kidd; freeforall
I started doing business in London, Ontario in the early 90's... I was amazed at how rapidly a city could fall into decline.

WE ARE THE DAMNED

TELL YOUR CHILDREN OUR STORY SO THAT THIS NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN

27 posted on 10/01/2003 2:31:15 PM PDT by jodorowsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jodorowsky
bttt
28 posted on 10/04/2003 10:40:33 AM PDT by freeforall (``I should change this more often'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson