To: Korth
Hannity argued last week that it was important to get behind Arnold because Conservatives would get 70% of what they stood for.
How long before we are settling for 55% ? 35% ? Extra rations from the guards?
On many issues, Arnold seems to be an empty suit.
To: NY.SS-Bar9
Hannity argued last week that it was important to get behind Arnold because Conservatives would get 70% of what they stood for. Perhaps he meant 7.0%.
20 posted on
09/30/2003 1:35:01 PM PDT by
Roscoe
To: NY.SS-Bar9
Arnold has made his views clear on a few issues. He'd like to recruit more people into government funded healthcare programs, fund afterschool babysitting programs, and allow the government to continue classifying people based on their race. All that before lunch!
To: NY.SS-Bar9
Hannity argued last week that it was important to get behind Arnold because Conservatives would get 70% of what they stood for. Well in this case it Arnold who going to "get behind" Conservatives and give us a 100% of you know what...
51 posted on
09/30/2003 2:28:35 PM PDT by
tophat9000
(California taxpayers w/Rnulled .. you just dropped the soap)
To: NY.SS-Bar9
Hannity argued last week that it was important to get behind Arnold because Conservatives would get 70% of what they stood for. I'd settle for 50%. Arnold is maybe 20%, and that depends on how the wind is blowing on economic issues that day.
63 posted on
09/30/2003 3:01:04 PM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
(A vote for McClintock is a vote for Kyle Reese...and a vote against Cruz.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson