Unarmed for the Election (McClintock, Schwartzenegger, and Gun Rights)

National Review ^ | September 30, 2003 | Dave Kopel

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

And Hannity swooned in adoration.

We can't be the only ones noticing what a sycophantic, principless shill Sean Hannity is. The gloves are coming off my friends, "Conserative" Talk Radio or not, some *art* on the subject is on the way...

[evilsmoker]

FYI, McClintock will be on Hardball tonight. No point in continuing to watch Hannity genuflect at the altar of Arnold.

[StoneColdGOP]

But... But... But... Arnold can WIN!!!

Go Arnold! YAY!

[Theodore R.]

shill Sean Hannity is

Well, is it that Sean is "becoming" a shill, rather than has been a shill. Thus far, he has been fairly critical of certain liberal tendencies of the Bush administration. but he is going all out for Arnold. Bruce Hershensohn (Sp.) is apparently one of the few conservatives staying put for McClintock. Even Robert Novak says he "endorses and would vote" for Arnold.

[Roscoe]

A governor has "veto" power. McClintock would exercise it, Arnie would not.

[Flashman_at_the_charge]

Me as well.

[going hot]

does your reluctance to answer reflect that he has not done anything in the last twenty years to thwart anti gun legislation, or that he simply has not been in a position of sufficient power to effect the outcome of same? Or is there a third (or more) reasons?

[Eagle Eye]

A vote for McClintock is a win-win deal. First, if he wins, the everyone wins. If he doesn't win this time, and Bustamonte wins, then CA will get McClintock or someone like him next general election. This election isn't the end of the world. Don't settle for liberals in RINO clothing. A known political enemy in office is better than a stealth enemy masquerading ad a friend.

[DoctorZIn]

Join Us…Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

[Reagan Man]

>>>When Arnold signs his first piece of gun control legislation, Hannity should be there to blow on the ink.

LOL

Hannity has been a major disappointment lately. I may have to take him off my list of influential conservatives and place him on my list of wishy-washy centrists. ;^)

[tophat9000]

Hannity argued last week that it was important to get behind Arnold because Conservatives would get 70% of what they stood for.

Well in this case it Arnold who going to "get behind" Conservatives and give us a 100% of you know what...

[Roscoe]

your reluctance to answer

You asked about vetos. Tom won't have a veto if he isn't elected governor. You also asked about unspecified legislative proposals that did not pass. Where do you look those up?

Arnold's anti-gun agenda is clear. Keep trying to dodge it.

[truthkeeper]

A deserving BTTT.

[tophat9000]

How soon before the first "McClintock took Indian $$$" defense shows up?

No next it will be "McClintock gave guns to the Indian!"

[Roscoe]

I was assuming Arnold won't use a crayon.

[tophat9000]

It seem Hannity been Flippertized!

[SunStar]

Don't argue, just vote Schwarzenegger!

[Roscoe]

[tophat9000]

You know in that John Wayne movie McClintock did give guns to the Indian!

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

Arnold's anti-gun agenda is clear. Keep trying to dodge it.

He's probably just been burned by so many politicians that he's just a big cynic.

Too bad there aren't more "Cynics" in CA concerning policy that haven't been Venturaized enough or Bloombergized enough to understand what they are doing to themselves...