Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gianni
I see in your apologetics, you also failed to cite the constitutional authority.

Authority to do what? To order the army and navy to blockade the southern coast? He has that authority as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, as per Article II, Section 2. The responsibility to combat rebellion? He had that authority as per the Militia Act of 1795. What authority are you referring to?

1,204 posted on 10/17/2003 2:39:14 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1198 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
The responsibility to combat rebellion? He had that authority as per the Militia Act of 1795.

That's good - now all you need to do is show how a sovereign can be 'in rebellion.'

1,231 posted on 10/18/2003 4:05:28 AM PDT by Gianni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson