Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gianni
Reponding to wlat's desire to selectively include the CSA in the union

I can't speak for Walt, but from what I see there was no selectivity to it. The southern states were never out of the Union.

1,182 posted on 10/17/2003 3:35:25 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1167 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
I can't speak for Walt, but from what I see there was no selectivity to it.

Do you want me to start pinging you when it shows up?

Here we have another obvious Lincolnian paradox. He was authorized to implement a blockade under the rules of international law. Any action involving a state of the Union would have required Constitutional approval. The SC did not cite the constitution. They cited international law. Then they play a game of switching back and forth between the two, using whichever is to the union's advantage throughout the war and reconstruction.

As a resident smary guy, I assumed that you knew and appreciated this, but just accepted that their right to do so needn't be questioned because their dicta carries with it the weight of law and the wrath of Lincon's enforcement policies (i.e. wielding power is the government's responsibility, justice be damned).

1,184 posted on 10/17/2003 3:58:53 AM PDT by Gianni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1182 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson