Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger's "Right Wing Crazies"
September 30th, 2003 | Sabertooth

Posted on 09/30/2003 8:36:48 AM PDT by Sabertooth

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: Sabertooth
The California Republican Party thinks Schwarzenegger is a great candidate ~ I can't argue as I'm not a California voter or a Republican ~ I'm an Independent living in Oregon. :-/

PS there are some "crazies" right here on FR, you've read the posts calling A.S. an "abortionist" yet, they offer no documentation showing where he performed an abortion.

For their information, abortion is federal law, not state law.
21 posted on 09/30/2003 8:58:31 AM PDT by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain



Only conservatives would be offended by that remark. As you can see on this thread, not many care...

To be fair, some are speechless.


22 posted on 09/30/2003 8:58:53 AM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
sabertooth-

Is this all you McClintockBots have to cling to??? How pathetic.

23 posted on 09/30/2003 8:59:52 AM PDT by montag813 (Fire Tenet...Jail Joseph Wilson...Rally 'Round Our President, Dammit!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackie
The California Republican Party thinks Schwarzenegger is a great candidate

The 1400 voting members of the California Republican Party at the state convention never voted on the question.

24 posted on 09/30/2003 9:02:41 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I'll grant you that I don't always write clearly (espechially on a few sips of coffee) but I thought what I was saying is that if "name calling" is now an issue for FReepers to consider in the recall, there is plenty to go around here. I said "FR discussion threads" that's US bro . . . not McClintock. But I'll try to be clearer next time.

Have a nice day . . . don't forget to vote. ;^)

25 posted on 09/30/2003 9:03:14 AM PDT by w_over_w
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blackie
For their information, abortion is federal law, not state law.

California's state funding of abortion, supported by Schwarzenegger, isn't mandated by federal law.

26 posted on 09/30/2003 9:04:23 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Isn't it great to be able to vote for who you want to vote for. :)
27 posted on 09/30/2003 9:05:49 AM PDT by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All
Does anyone know when the LA Times Poll is due to be released? Thanks!
28 posted on 09/30/2003 9:06:28 AM PDT by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: blackie
Isn't it great to be able to vote for who you want to vote for.

Yep. He's staying in despite the threats.

29 posted on 09/30/2003 9:07:43 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
In response to your thoroughly researched facts, only four out of 22 posts (so far) are personal attacks.

Not bad. I expected worse.
30 posted on 09/30/2003 9:07:51 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (California! See how low WE can go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: blackie
Arnold's Hero !

In 2001, Buffett donated over $9 million to Planned Parenthood, the world’s largest abortion provider. According to Business Week, the Buffett foundation made a $20 million commitment to International Projects Assistance Services, a company that actually manufactures suction pumps used in abortion procedures.<p> Steve Mosher, director of the Virginia-based Population Research Institute, spoke on behalf of pro-life shareholders at the Berkshire Hathaway, “It’s the money to actually do the abortions… the nuts and bolts, the hard stuff that he funds.”

31 posted on 09/30/2003 9:08:47 AM PDT by Afronaut (Zombie voters For Liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: montag813


Is this all you McClintockBots have to cling to??? How pathetic.

You're so right, but I do prefer "McClintockBot" to "right wing crazy." A quirk, I guess.

The purpose of this thread, of course, is to point out to Schwarzenegger's supporters who rely on the Walsh denial that there is more to this "right wing crazies" thing than they're apparently aware.

After all, if they thought this was a non-issue, they wouldn't bother reposting the denial by Walsh.


32 posted on 09/30/2003 9:11:16 AM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
California's state funding of abortion, supported by Schwarzenegger, isn't mandated by federal law.

AAAAAAAAAGGGGGG! This aint about abortion damn it. This isn't the issue! Not even on the map! Crips!

33 posted on 09/30/2003 9:12:52 AM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
The choices are simple.
1. Davis. We all know where he stands.
2. Cruz - Davis lite, and MechA member.
3. Arnold - Establishment candidate. Pro-choice, anti-2nd Amendment, says he's anti-tax but then has Buffett, Wilson, and Riordan as advisors. He's 'for the chillldren'. Wouldn't answer the question on Ward Connerly's initaitive. He MIGHT be alright fiscally, but there are a lot of doubts.
4. McClintock - Pro-life. Pro-2a. Anti-tax RECORD and stood up to Davis AND Wilson. Supports Connerly. Gives straight answers to questions.
34 posted on 09/30/2003 9:14:35 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan (A vote for McClintock is a vote for Kyle Reese...and a vote against Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Forgot to mention illegals. McClintock was the only one mentioning that issue.
35 posted on 09/30/2003 9:15:27 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan (A vote for McClintock is a vote for Kyle Reese...and a vote against Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut
Arnold is a trojan horse in the Republican Party. IF he is elected and IF he pulls California out of its morass (doubtful) then he will wield huge power in the Party and be very popular - able to deliver the CA Republican party primary votes to a liberal Republican opponent of Bush. Don't think he won't do it if this scenario works out - remember to whom he is married. Sen. Kennedy is licking his chops. If they can get Arnold in and IF they can get at least a semblance of CA being better off because he is governnor then Arnold/Kennedy will have a big clout in the party and they can try to dump BUSH - maybe get a liberal Republican to steal the nomination or at least damage BUSH so badly in the bloody battle to follow that he is extremely weakened.
36 posted on 09/30/2003 9:17:59 AM PDT by kkindt (knightforhire.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
AAAAAAAAAGGGGGG!

Just one of his many left wing positions.

37 posted on 09/30/2003 9:18:22 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; Admin Moderator
1. Does a Vanity post qualify as Front Page news now, just as long as it bashed Arnold, even if it consists of lies?

2.The allegation was denied contemporaneously, published in the same article, which raised the allegation, which I posted here several times. I remember posting it to you the last time you were propagating these lies.

Here it is again -- even the title of the article includes the repudiation:

Prop. 54 backer: Schwarzenegger gave him an earful. Candidate's camp denies reported 'crazies' remark

Sean Walsh, a spokesman for Schwarzenegger, said Tuesday that the exchange "never happened."

"Someone did ask him his position on Proposition 54, and he expressed his concerns about the health-care aspects and educational aspects," Walsh said. "With regard to any additional comments, they never happened."

38 posted on 09/30/2003 9:20:32 AM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
There seems to be a lot of them on FR.
39 posted on 09/30/2003 9:21:00 AM PDT by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
In response to your thoroughly researched facts, only four out of 22 posts (so far) are personal attacks.

Well, it appears that some strategize to ignore threads like this, hoping they will die quickly.

Not a problem, though... I just wanted to put it all together, as a reference.

Zero attempts to refute any of it, I've noticed.

Thanks for your comments.


40 posted on 09/30/2003 9:21:51 AM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson