Posted on 09/30/2003 8:18:36 AM PDT by quidnunc
If this was pre-9-11 it would appropriate. But 9-11 happened and the urgency is much greater and the stakes higher.
What alternative would you propose? I happen to agree with you that we are at war, and I believe that it is a war for the very survival of our civilization. While I agree that we need to be ruthless and merciless in destroying our enemies, we have to do so in a very complicated world.
For example, nuking Mecca would be a bad idea. On the other hand, systematically eliminating anti-American Mullahs and Clerics (accidents can happen to anyone) wherever they may be would be a good thing (starting with the ones right here at home where they feel the safest). First of all there would be fewer and fewer of them willing to spout their vitriole to recruit mainstream Muslims, and secondly it would drive the radicall elements underground together into a more close knit, and consequently nicer target.
In any case these are just some thoughts. I really do believe that there is much more going on behind the scenes than we hear about and that we are making progress.
One area that Bush should be castigated on though is his refusal to enlarge our armed forces. Instead of trumpeting the idiotic and useless freedom corps and "love your neighbor" poll tested rhetoric, he should have sent out a call for enlistment. He did not and thus we're in need of allied troops thus circumventing his own policy of unilateralism.
President Bush may be allowing Annan to "cut his own throat," till he hears a loud cry for the U.S. to get out of the U.N.
I think, war or no war, his popularity would soar!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.