Skip to comments.
The United Nations: Heading for History's Dustbin?
The Globe and Mail ^
| September 30, 2003
| Paul Koring and Anthony Jenkins
Posted on 09/30/2003 8:18:36 AM PDT by quidnunc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
09/30/2003 8:18:36 AM PDT
by
quidnunc
To: quidnunc
Doubtful. Our current Republican President has us more engaged with the organization. If one who is a member of the GOP won't get rid of this useless waste of space of an organzation, one can only shudder to think what DEMORAT will do.
2
posted on
09/30/2003 8:25:20 AM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: quidnunc
We can only hope and pray.
3
posted on
09/30/2003 8:27:12 AM PDT
by
ZULU
To: quidnunc
The United Nations: Heading for History's Dustbin? Yes, please!
To: Teacher317
I really hope so.
5
posted on
09/30/2003 8:32:44 AM PDT
by
Pikamax
To: quidnunc



UN World Conference Against Racism



6
posted on
09/30/2003 8:34:09 AM PDT
by
fishtank
To: quidnunc
Well the league of nations went down the toilet, but it took a world war. Unfortunately, it would take a world war to get us out of the UN.
To: knighthawk
ping
8
posted on
09/30/2003 8:55:23 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
To: hoosierboy
The United Nations war policy is based on principals of Western Civilization: orderly, controlled and civilized warfare. Outside the West and Western oriented nations, the concept of a "non-combatant" is mere fantasy. Look at the manner in which Israel (a Western oriented nation) conducts operations against Arabs in the West Bank versus the manner in which those same Arabs operate against Israel. The UN is unable to deal effectively with these people because they refuse to play by the UN's rules. Thus the UN's very short success list.
9
posted on
09/30/2003 9:02:50 AM PDT
by
bobjam
To: quidnunc
The term "dustbin" isn't anything I'd use.
In my mind, closing down the United Nations is more like sealing off a campground outhouse.
To: bobjam
Yeah and the pallies live in UN run "refugee camps" and the un lets them launch rockets, build bombs, shoot guns. All under the watchfull eye of the UN.
To: NonValueAdded
Thanks, a great one
12
posted on
09/30/2003 9:17:44 AM PDT
by
knighthawk
(Freedom is my believe, for you I would die)
To: Tom Jefferson; backhoe; Militiaman7; BARLF; timestax; imintrouble; cake_crumb; Brad's Gramma; ...
Bluntly, the UN has been a miserable failure if measured by wars prevented, or its record of legitimizing military force to right egregious wrongs.
No more UN for US-list
If people want on or off this list, please let me know.
13
posted on
09/30/2003 9:18:44 AM PDT
by
knighthawk
(Freedom is my believe, for you I would die)
To: knighthawk
Headed for history's dustbin? No... I would say it went there a long time ago. The UN is dead, they just don't realize it yet
To: thinktwice
In my mind, closing down the United Nations is more like sealing off a campground outhouse. ROFLMAO!! Quote of the Day material!
15
posted on
09/30/2003 9:25:10 AM PDT
by
randog
(Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
To: quidnunc
Hey, the Delian League didn't last forever, no reason to think that the UN will. The sooner we get Kofi packing his bags and heading back for Ghana, the better I'll like it.
To: KantianBurke
Doubtful. Our current Republican President has us more engaged with the organization. Would you not agree that engaging them forces them to either act or expose their inactivity? I believe that the Bush administration is purposely engaging them, and as more Americans realize the UN is indeed irrelevant, support for changing it will grow.
To: quidnunc
May the UN rest in peace
18
posted on
09/30/2003 10:05:44 AM PDT
by
tm22721
(May the UN rest in peace)
To: ExpatCanuck
Unlikely. Has Bush made ANY public speeches deriding the UN? No. In fact, his last address, if it did anything, made the organization more respectful and viewed as being useful. "We need to take down terrorists but need allies and the only way to obtain their help is through the UN" isn't exactly an all resounding call for the UN's demolition. Lastly even if you were correct and that was the path Bush is taking, its wrong on its face. Wasting taxpayer money on a venture you WANT to fail is theft. Pure and simple.
19
posted on
09/30/2003 10:10:36 AM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: KantianBurke
Unlikely. Has Bush made ANY public speeches deriding the UN?You seem to be missing my point. Can you imagine the political fallout of such a speech? The reality is that there are politics involved here. If he were to deride the UN it would be portrayed by the left as his trying to shift the blame for all his own 'failures' to the very UN he defied and didn't listen to.
Instead he will give them every opportunity to prove their ineffectiveness, without giving anyone ammunition to fuel the claim that he is responsible for the UN's failure.
I believe that when all is said an done, most rational people will look back and say, "Hey, Bush gave the UN every opportunity to have a positive influence, and they blew it".
Be patient, this is a chess game, not craps.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson