Skip to comments.
Sniper Victim Joins Lawmakers to Urge Renewal/Strengthening of Assault Weapons Ban
releases.usnewswire.com ^
Posted on 09/30/2003 8:13:56 AM PDT by chance33_98
One Year After Attacks, Sniper Victim Joins Lawmakers to Urge Renewal and Strengthening of Assault Weapons Ban
9/30/03 10:26:00 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Assignment Desk, Daybook Editor
Contact: Blaine Rummel of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence & The Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence, 202-408-0061, ext. 118; http://www.csgv.org
News Advisory:
-- Sonia Wills, mother of final sniper victim, wants to ban all assault weapons - including Bushmaster XM15 that killed her son
-- Strong support revealed for S. 1431 and H.R. 2038
WHAT: Press conference to commemorate the one year anniversary of the DC-area sniper attacks and call for supporting S. 1431 and H.R. 2038 - identical bills that will both renew and strengthen the federal assault weapons ban. Violating the spirit of the 1994 law, the gun industry has manufactured "post-ban" assault weapons like the Bushmaster XM15 used in last year's sniper shootings. "Post-ban" assault weapons are identical to those banned, except for minor cosmetic changes.
The current ban will expire Sept. 13, 2004 unless President Bush and Congress act.
VISUALS: Replica of an Uzi assault weapon
WHERE: Russell Senate Office Building, Rm. 385
WHEN: Wednesday, Oct. 1, 1:30 p.m. EDT
WHO: Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.); Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.); Sen. Jon Corzine (D-N.J.); Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.); Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.); Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.); Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.)
-- Sonia Wills, Mother of Montgomery County bus driver Conrad Johnson, the 13th and final sniper victim
-- Dr. Sheldon Teperman, MD, assistant professor of Surgery, Trauma and Critical Care Services, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, N.Y.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 2amd; bang; banglist; dcsniper; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: chance33_98
" "Post-ban" assault weapons are identical to those banned, except for minor cosmetic changes. "
LOL! Pass a law based on 'minor cosmetic' differences and then complain when people make 'minor cosmetic changes.'
2
posted on
09/30/2003 8:16:16 AM PDT
by
toothless
To: chance33_98
Sonia Wills, mother of final sniper victim, wants to ban all assault weapons - including Bushmaster XM15 that killed her sonLet's ban cancer, too. For all the mothers that have lost their children to that disease.
Then, we can work on banning murder. That way we'll ALL be safe.
It just FEELS good, doesn't it?
3
posted on
09/30/2003 8:18:28 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: chance33_98
If you're the average Joe, how do you defend against a sniper rifle? Its not as if its a mugger who will crawl away once you pull out your .357.
4
posted on
09/30/2003 8:19:07 AM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: toothless
Sonia Wills, mother of final sniper victim, wants to ban all assault weapons - including Bushmaster XM15 that killed her son I feel sorry for this mother's loss, but the DC snipers fired a single shot at their victims, and a bolt-action hunting rifle would have been just as deadly.
5
posted on
09/30/2003 8:29:03 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(CongressmanBillyBob/John Armor for Congress - you can't separate them, so send 'em both to D.C.)
To: KantianBurke
A sniper fires one bullet not a burst. You don't need an assault rifle. A bolt action makes a better sniper rifle. If the shooter had a .22LR they'd try to ban that too.
6
posted on
09/30/2003 8:31:52 AM PDT
by
Bringbackthedraft
(So where is Living History now? $1 by December?)
To: chance33_98
It's not the Bushmaster,it's the sick bastard who is pulling the trigger.I'm sorry for your loss,but an inanimate object has no moral culpability.
To: *bang_list
8
posted on
09/30/2003 8:32:27 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
("How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!" -- Samuel Adams)
To: newgeezer
Ping
9
posted on
09/30/2003 8:33:13 AM PDT
by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrisssssssstian)
To: Bringbackthedraft
Meaning? Once again, how can you defend yourself against an individual from xxx yards away who has a sniper rifle trained on you? What good would your cc gun do for that matter?
10
posted on
09/30/2003 8:34:38 AM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: KantianBurke
If you're the average Joe, how do you defend against a sniper rifle? Its not as if its a mugger who will crawl away once you pull out your .357.
The person in the sniper's sights is not the only potential armed person around who can act.
To: Beelzebubba
So in essence you are therefore dependant upon another for your safety? Kinda like dialing 9-1-1 and waiting 20 minutes for the cops to show up.
12
posted on
09/30/2003 8:40:01 AM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: chance33_98
The AWB didn't stop the Washington snipers. The triggerman was a minor and the mastermind had a restraining order against him and was a convicted felon. They still managed to get a weapon despite over 22,000 existing gun laws.
13
posted on
09/30/2003 8:42:50 AM PDT
by
mbynack
To: KantianBurke
No more good than it would against a scumbag hiding in the trunk of a car, 25 yeards away, like Malvo and Mohammed did. It's not 300 yard shots you need to worry about, it's the scumbag that comes from out of nowhere. A 300, or even a 200 yeard shot takes some skill level to make, which means the shooter would have to practice a bit in order to achieve that skill level. Your typical scumbag criminal wouldn't have the facilities, or even the inclination to practice that much, and the typical lawful shooter, who has achieved that proficiency level, is not a scumbag criminal.
In fact, I would go so far as to say that none of the high-profile shootings that we've heard about over the last 15 years of anti-gun hysteria were done from 100+ yards. If memory serves me correctly, they've all been relatively short range shootings...inside schools, offices, on the street, etc.
So, again, it's not the long-range shooter you need to worry about, it's the murderer with any weapon, who's close by. He could have an AR-15, and cheapie .380, a knife, a beer mug, or a car. If he doesn't want you to know about it, you won't.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
14
posted on
09/30/2003 8:45:59 AM PDT
by
wku man
("I'm not a hero...I just like hitting people in the head!" Nelson Munz)
To: KantianBurke
Kinda like dialing 9-1-1 and waiting 20 minutes for the cops to show up. Or not showing up at all. Approximately 20% of all 911 calls in the Washington DC area go unanswered. I guess they feel that having the most restrictive gun laws in the country means that the cops don't need to respond.
15
posted on
09/30/2003 8:46:10 AM PDT
by
mbynack
To: chance33_98
If only hunting humans with a sniper rifle had been illegal, none of this would have occurred. I feel much safer now.
Owl_Eagle
Guns Before Butter.
To: wku man
Dang it! yeard = yard, yeards = yards
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
17
posted on
09/30/2003 8:48:56 AM PDT
by
wku man
("I'm not a hero...I just like hitting people in the head!" Nelson Munz)
To: mbynack
Separated at birth?

18
posted on
09/30/2003 8:50:04 AM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: mbynack
Two culprits in the DC sniper case. One the FFL gun dealer who violated all the laws when he sold the gun to the sniper. Two, PC profiling that had the cops looking for a white man when a witness had come forth and claimed to see a black man. Hesitation by Chief Moose to issue an all points bulletin for a black man and it lead to officers at a road block recalling letting a blue car with two black man in it go by at a road block after a shooting. They did not stop them because they were still being told by PC profiling that the sniper is mostly likely a white rightwing gun/militia nut. The dealer and the police should be sued for their incompetence.
19
posted on
09/30/2003 9:05:26 AM PDT
by
Fee
To: KantianBurke
You can't defend yourself from sniper attack as an idividual. A concealed carry firearm isn't going to help.
The question is will banning some (or all) rifles make this problem disapear. The answer is no, it will not. Because there are hundreds of millions of guns out there and because people who want to do evil will find a way. We've had mass killing by anthrax, airplane, automobile, suicide bomb, rifle, pistol, sword, arson and a bunch more I can't think of.
The nightclub fire killed a bunch of people and was set with gasoline. Register gasoline? Ban the sale of gasoline?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson