actually, no. We don't know. My personal sources tell me she wasn't. Further, they tell me that she was a Clinton drone put in place as a "spinner" or a "minder" to make sure that the "proper" interpretation of the "evidence" was put forward. None of that is confimed or discredited. Neither is the info that she was a spy. Her husband very pointedly would NOT go on record that his wife was an undercover agent. As a practical matter she's blown, even if she was undecover, so what's he protecting? Certainly not national security. He destoryed that by violating his sworn oath and legal responsibility to keep secret his involvement in the investigation. No matter what else comes out of this he should be branded a criminal, if not a traitor.
My instincts tell me that this is a put up and she's a political drone being used by the enemies of this country. She may or may not be among those enemies. We need to KNOW, not be fed partisan spin.
my anecdote about my wifes uncle was meant only to illustrate that even the most ludicrous set of circumstances shouldn't be taken as proof or as evidence of lack of proof. I want the questions asked and answered. Of Bush's people and of Wilson and his supporters. I want to know who is serving the interests of this country and who is not. I have my prejudices. I want to get some facts.
Personally, my money's on Miss Valerie being the "CIA source" quoted in the July 3 Beeb story that Shermy linked in #121. She and her husband, "the former diplomat", look very much like a husband-wife tag team of Democrat spinners to me.
But, like you, I want to KNOW what's really going on here. I've got my suspicions, but it's far better to have the truth.