Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ann Archy
According to Jim Angle, just now on Fox, she was undercover, but that itself was a secret, so, even though everyone knew she worked at CIA, the "fact" that she was working undercover was a secret? OK. Let me get this straight. It was widely known that she worked at CIA, but that was a cover so that she could really be a CIA spy?

Now, that's not as crazy as you think. My wifes uncle was a crypie for the CIA in their embassies overseas. He needed a cover identity because being the crypie for the CIA was a secret. Therefore the "cover" identity for him was that he was a crypie for the Pentagon. See, it makes perfect sense.....

wrapping duct tape tightly around my head so that when it explodes I'll still have all of the PIECES......

130 posted on 09/30/2003 3:10:41 PM PDT by Phsstpok (often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Phsstpok
So She WAS a spy!! What IDIOT thought of this ploy? Sending a hack to sip tea and hang out at the Embassy while the "little woman" gathers Intel and EVERYONE KNOWS she works for the CIA??

GEORGE TENET!!

132 posted on 09/30/2003 3:58:59 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson