Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House 'warned over Iraq claim'(Was the Novak story shopped around?)
BBC ^ | July9,2003

Posted on 09/29/2003 5:34:27 PM PDT by Dog

Last Updated: Wednesday, 9 July, 2003, 06:31 GMT 07:31 UK

White House 'warned over Iraq claim'

The CIA warned the US Government that claims about Iraq's nuclear ambitions were not true months before President Bush used them to make his case for war, the BBC has learned. Doubts about a claim that Iraq had tried to buy uranium from the African state of Niger were aired 10 months before Mr Bush included the allegation in his key State of the Union address this year, a CIA official has told the BBC.

On Tuesday, the White House for the first time officially acknowledged that the Niger claim was wrong and suggested it should not have been used in the president's State of the Union speech in January.

Uranium row in quotes But the CIA official has said that a former US diplomat had already established the claim was false in March 2002 - and that the information had been passed on to government departments, including the White House, well before Mr Bush mentioned it in the speech.

Both President Bush and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair mentioned the claim, based on British intelligence, that Iraq was trying to get uranium from Niger as part of its attempt to build a nuclear weapons programme.

Mr Blair is under fire from British MPs about the credibility of a dossier of evidence, which set out his case for war.

And in the US, increasing doubts are being raised about the American use of intelligence.

Forged documents

In his keynote speech to Congress in January, the President said: "The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

But the documents alleging a transaction were found to have been forged.

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer appeared to concede on Tuesday that the uranium claim in the State of the Union address was based on inaccurate information.

"The president's statement was based on the predicate of the yellow cake [uranium] from Niger," Mr Fleischer said.

"So given the fact that the report on the yellow cake did not turn out to be accurate, that is reflective of the president's broader statement."

The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.

President George W Bush

Mr Bush's State of the Union address But a former US diplomat, Ambassador Joseph Wilson, went on the record at the weekend to say that he had travelled to Africa to investigate the uranium claims and found no evidence to support them.

Now the CIA official has told the BBC that Mr Wilson's findings had been passed onto the White House as early as March 2002.

That means that the administration would have known nearly a year before the State of the Union address that the information was likely false.

In response, a US Government official told the BBC that the White House received hundreds of intelligence reports every day.

The official said there was no evidence that this specific cable about uranium had been passed on to the president.

But in Congress, Democrats are demanding a full investigation into the intelligence that underpinned the case for war.

They have demanded to know if President Bush used evidence that he knew to be weak or wrong.

British undeterred

The British Government has stood by its assertion, saying the forged documents were not the only evidence used to reach its conclusion that Saddam Hussein tried to buy uranium from Africa.

On Tuesday Mr Blair defended the assessment, telling a committee of MPs that it was not a "fantasy" and that the intelligence services themselves stood by the allegation.

"The evidence that we had that the Iraqi Government had gone back to try to purchase further amounts of uranium from Niger did not come from these so-called 'forged' documents, they came from separate intelligence," Mr Blair said.

However, Mr Blair did not specify what that separate intelligence was.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: niger; novak; wilson; yellowcake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
This was linked by freeper mewzilla on another thread and thought it needed to be in breaking news.

Note the time stamp on the article.....July 9th........6 days before the Novak article was printed.

Someone was shopping the story around...

1 posted on 09/29/2003 5:34:27 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Can you fix the title....I meant shopped.
2 posted on 09/29/2003 5:35:12 PM PDT by Dog (This wednesday is my birthday and I officially become older than dirt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla; M. Thatcher
fyi..
3 posted on 09/29/2003 5:36:16 PM PDT by Dog (This wednesday is my birthday and I officially become older than dirt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seamole; MJY1288
fyi..
4 posted on 09/29/2003 5:38:03 PM PDT by Dog (This wednesday is my birthday and I officially become older than dirt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog
With the "Evil Party," anything is possible.
5 posted on 09/29/2003 5:39:50 PM PDT by My2Cents (Well...there you go again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Actually July 9th was the date Joseph Wilson penned his op ed in the NY times, criticizing the W.H. on Uranium story. This BBC story is just a piggy back of the Op ed. It was 5 days after the op ed, that Novak was leaked on Valerie Plame. This is what was going on then.

6 posted on 09/29/2003 5:40:49 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
I think the Bush Administration is behind this request for an investigation, How better to get to the truth than an open investigation into all involved, form the CIA, STATE DEPT and the White House, including Phone records, for the White House and Joseph Wilson's contacts to the CIA and State Dept. and Wilson's wife's records

There is more than one way to skin a cat

7 posted on 09/29/2003 5:43:49 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Who Would the Terrorist Vote For ??????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dog; archy; seamole; Sabertooth; Wolfstar
You're a shy dog, Dog.

For others: the going theory on other threads is that the "CIA official" quoted by the BBC is none other than Valerie Palme, Mr. Wilson's wife.

8 posted on 09/29/2003 5:45:52 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
Actually July 9th was the date Joseph Wilson penned his op ed in the NY times, criticizing the W.H. on Uranium story.

Did Wilson's story mention a "CIA official?"

9 posted on 09/29/2003 5:47:04 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
its time for the full truth to come out on this. the part of the article about the brits standing by the story because they have other intel, john loftus has been talking about this for months: the forged documents were planted by the french as a poison pill to discredit the whole story, since they are in the chain between iraq and niger. and wilson is part of it.

blow the lid on all of this.
10 posted on 09/29/2003 5:51:06 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Well, well, well. Of course! The diplomat and the CIA "official". Wilson and wife. Now how do we get this connection verified? Need to get this connection to Rush for sure.
11 posted on 09/29/2003 5:52:19 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dog
4 references to "a CIA official" in the article who was interviewed for the article. Is the "CIA official" being referred to Wilson's wife??
12 posted on 09/29/2003 5:53:13 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: moonshawn
moonshawn
Since Sep 30, 2003
14 posted on 09/29/2003 5:59:02 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dog
You mean all the clintonistas have gotten their stories straight - and now the story is for sale ..??

That's what I'm getting. Clinton was very loudly telling all the democrats to SHUT UP about this story - and now suddenly it's back in the news again.

I smell a smear. However, since Wilson is already backpeddling on the Karl Rove accusation - I think this is going to be another of those open the door and hit themselves in the face items. Rush agreed with that today.
15 posted on 09/29/2003 6:00:14 PM PDT by CyberAnt (America - The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: moonshawn
Your post demonstrates once again the oft-observed reality: liberals really don't possess the capacity to think. You merely repeat talking points.
19 posted on 09/29/2003 6:06:15 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: moonshawn
Hi I'm Karl Rove.....

BOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

You all need to get another bogey man...

20 posted on 09/29/2003 6:07:08 PM PDT by Dog (This wednesday is my birthday and I officially become older than dirt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson