Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: laconic
Agreed. And Hellman suffering doesn't strike me as being equivalent to Solzhenitsyn suffering.
3 posted on 09/29/2003 5:50:56 PM PDT by niteowl77 (If you haven't prayed for our troops, please start; if you stopped, then do some catching up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: edskid
Kazan suffered FAR MORE FROM THE LEFT WING BLACKLIST than the communists he named, who were inconvenienced for a while in the 1950s but went to do whatever their talents took them. Kazan after the 1950s was not given any decent budget movies, he was sidelined, despite being one of the best directors America ever had.

Many of those Kazan named were 'finished' career-wise because their talent was not that great.

And Lillian Hellman was a commie b***h who made the leftist Sarandon seem sane, saintly and moderate! She was that bad!

8 posted on 09/29/2003 6:24:48 PM PDT by WOSG (DONT PUT CALI ON CRUZ CONTROL & VOTE YES ON 54!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: edskid
Mary McCarthy, a fellow-traveler in the mostly Marxist, New York-centered, American literary scene, concluded that just about everything Lillian Hellman said or wrote was a lie. The simple fact is that most of the people who comprise the American literary set then and now have either themselves been commies or have been extremely sympathetic to communism and the former Soviet Union. Good riddance to any of their ilk and a plague upon their careers.
22 posted on 09/30/2003 1:35:57 AM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson