Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impeach the Boy
My argument is based upon MULTIPLE polls that say McClintock cannot win, versus ONE poll that says he would win.

Please post these polls.

(Not the ones that include all 3 in them. I want to see other polls that say if Arnold gets out McClintock would lose. I haven't seen any. Just the Gallup poll that suggests Tom would kill Bustamonte.)

I think we need some disclosure here from the people who simply won't vote for Tom because he's too conservative for them. Because what I keep hearing is, "Well Arnold's the only one who can beat Cruz." But the only poll that's investigated that scenario shows otherwise.

So my question is--regardless of how you're actually going to vote----if you could "wave your magic wand," who do you wish would win."

If you really want Arnold--that's fine.

If you want Tom, but have been convinced that he can't win--that's fine too (see my previous arguments).

But until I see evidence to the contrary, I have to assume that the Gallup Poll is correct and Tom McClintock would beat Cruz Bustamonte in a one-on-one match-up. Which means...

If we want the most conservative and best suited (those are two different sets of criteria) person to win the Governorship--then Arnold should get out of the race and let Tom win.

For some reason, despite the protests to the contrary, I have a feeling that's not what these Arnold-only-because-he-can-win people want.

And for the record, I don't consider myself some superior moralist for voting for Tom. I consider myself able to read the political tea leaves and see the bigger picture. I am not falling on my sword or dying on any hill. I am simply not going to hand the Republican Party over to the liberal-moderate wing for--who knows how long?

Have you thought about that? Arnold (+ Maria) will load the government bureaucracy with libs and moderates and there will be no room for conservatives or libertarian free thinkers for a long time to come.

Consider my bastardization of what Truman used to say, "Anytime you put a Democrat up against a Democrat, the Democrats win every time."

The whole point of my initial post was to generate discussion and provoke thought.

That has been achieved.

Vote your heart--and your head. They can be one in the same.

All the best...

199 posted on 10/01/2003 11:20:16 AM PDT by ElephantMan (sorry, no smart a$$ tag line today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: ElephantMan
How noble is it to vote with your HEART if doing so elects a liberal socialist democrat? Do you love your country or your candidate/pure politics more?

I would GREATLY prefer McClintock over Arnold, but GREATLY prefer Arnold over putting the same people who bankrupted the state back into office....as Doug From The Upland put it....better to have someone in office who aggress with 30% of my views, than someone who disagrees with 100% of my views....

You hypothetical polls do not work...there is NOT going to be a McClintock versus Cruz election....there will be, most likely a three way, and McClintock will NOT win it, but COULD cause Cruz to get elected...I see NO principle, no honor is such action.
200 posted on 10/01/2003 4:02:36 PM PDT by Moby Grape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson