Posted on 09/29/2003 5:15:01 PM PDT by ElephantMan
First, a GOVERNOR cannot reverse Roe v. Wade.
Second, although Arnold is NOT Pro-Life, Arnold IS AGAINST Partial-Birth Abortion and IS FOR Parental Notification.
Back in 1974, I was VERY Pro-Abortion. I had a college assignment to do a "FAIR and BALANCED" simulated radio broadcast on a controversial issue and I picked abortion, thinking I would put what I thought were "those religious nuts" to shame. After having to investigate the OTHER side (i.e. the Pro-Life side), I became Pro-Life LITERALLY OVERNIGHT! There is hope for Arnold.
I am not sure how anti-2nd Amendment he is, since he has made MILLIONS in the MOVIE industry using GUNS.
Regarding his economic attitude, the FACT that he has ALSO made MILLIONS via his INVESTMENTS, I actually believe that HE is probably the BEST choice for enabling California to make MILLIONS if not BILLIONS. He KNOWS how to make SOUND ECONOMIC DECISIONS BETTER THAN ANY OTHER CANDIDATE FOR GOVERNOR!!!---He is the ONLY one who has DONE IT!
CLAUDIUSTG ADDED: "Then what? Are we going to pray to Maria to interceed for us?"
LOL.
CLAUDIUSTG ADDED: "But he can win..."
As stated above, I believe Arnold is the BEST QUALIFIED to turn the California economy around. And the ONLY way he can have that opportunity is to WIN! And he has the BEST chance for winning!
Frankly, I would MUCH rather see McClintock run for (and WIN) U.S. SENATOR, to give California a CONSERVATIVE VOICE, for such things as FEDERAL JUDGE ADVISING AND CONSENTING...HINT...HINT!!!
All I can say is that I might be able to support him over Arnold in such a hypothetical matchup.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.