To: Poohbah
Sorry, you're wrong. The poll included ALL (Dem, Rep, Indep, Grn) Probable Voters and was taken Sept. 25-27. Check out the Drudge Report, he posted the link. They don't even break it down by party. But the most recent LA Times poll showed Tom had TWICE the number of Independents that Arnold had:
McClintock 28%
Arnold 14%
Bustamante 24%
To: evilsmoker
Kinda blows up alot of theories propagated around here, doesn't it...
To: evilsmoker
Why did McClintock not run as an independent? Better yet, I wish Arnold had gone the independant route, because he would still be beating McClintock badly, and possibly beating Bustamante by even more.
To: evilsmoker
The poll included ALL (Dem, Rep, Indep, Grn) Probable Voters and was taken Sept. 25-27.Actually, the poll does not say that at all.
But the most recent LA Times poll
If you are citing ANYTHING published by the LA Times, you have no business calling anyone else a RINO, RINO.
181 posted on
09/29/2003 12:28:02 PM PDT by
Poohbah
("[Expletive deleted] 'em if they can't take a joke!" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson