Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul - Your Money In Iraq
House Web Site ^ | 9-29-2003 | Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX)

Posted on 09/29/2003 10:40:39 AM PDT by jmc813

Ambassador Paul Bremer, head of the US provisional administration in Iraq, appeared before Congress last week to lobby hard for another $87 billion for nation building. This figure is in addition to the nearly $80 billion we’ve already spent in Iraq, and the new funding request is for 2004 only. If we stay in Iraq beyond 2004- and the administration has made it clear that reconstruction will be a long-term project- American taxpayers easily could spend one trillion dollars over the coming years.

The stark reality is that the federal government will fund the open-ended occupation of Iraq either by raising taxes, borrowing overseas, or printing more money. All three options are bad for average Americans.

It’s important the American people know exactly what they will be paying for in Iraq. The $87 billion requested is such a huge sum that it seems meaningless to most of us. The details, however, will astound anyone who resents seeing their tax dollars spent overseas.

The following are just some of the administration’s requests:

-$100 million for several new housing communities, complete with roads, schools, and a medical clinic;

-$20 million for business classes, at a cost of $10,000 per Iraqi student;

-$900 million for imported kerosene and diesel, even though Iraq has huge oil reserves;

-$54 million to study the Iraqi postal system;

-$10 million for prison-building consultants;

-$2 million for garbage trucks;

-$200,000 each for Iraqis in a witness protection program;

-$100 million for hundreds of criminal investigators; and

-$400 million for two prisons, at a cost of nearly $50,000 per bed!

I doubt very seriously that most Americans would approve of their tax dollars being used to fund these projects in Iraq.

Criticism of this foreign aid spending in Iraq is not restricted to the political left. Conservative groups and politicians are increasingly angry at the administration’s exorbitant spending. For example, Congressman Zach Wamp of Tennessee sits on the Appropriations committee, which is responsible for all spending bills. He has a modest idea: insist the reconstruction money be paid back as a loan when Iraq’s huge oil reserves resume operation. Similarly, Congressman Jeff Flake of Arizona wants to offset every dollar spent reconstructing Iraq with spending cuts in others areas, especially given the amount of wasteful pork in the federal budget. But the White House is adamantly opposed to both ideas. Why is a supposedly conservative administration resisting even the slightest attempts at fiscal restraint?

We have embarked on probably the most extensive nation-building experiment in history. Our provisional authority seeks nothing less than to rebuild Iraq’s judicial system, financial system, legal system, transportation system, and political system from the top down- all with hundreds of billion of US tax dollars. We will all pay to provide job-training for Iraqis, while more and more Americans find themselves out of work. We will pay to secure the Iraqi borders, while our own borders remain porous and vulnerable. We will pay for housing, health care, social services, utilities, roads, schools, jails, and food in Iraq, leaving American taxpayers with less money to provide these things for themselves at home. We will saddle future generations with billions in government debt. The question of whether Iraq is worth this much to us is one lawmakers should answer now by refusing to approve another nickel for nation building.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: iraq; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last
To: bc2
!
81 posted on 09/29/2003 8:46:35 PM PDT by inPhase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Actually, John, I am in agreement with you on most things, but to consign yourself to the guillotine means that you will no longer, after your appointment is kept, be able to influence events in any way.

Victory requires that no one willing and able to make even the tiniest positive contribution may sell his life cheaply. Look at Solzhenitsyn, who caused such damage to the enemy. If he had insisted on dying _Gulag_ would never have been written.

82 posted on 09/30/2003 1:00:32 AM PDT by Iris7 (Victory, always Victory, at any cost, though the beasts of Hell march against us!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: bc2
I have not given in in any way. What we are engaged in is politics, and politics is the same thing as war less the systematic killing, to re-interpret Clausewitz's famous dictum.

The first thing that must be done is to allow ourselves to see the situation we are in clearly. Only then can we act prudently. We are in a post - Republic, very late Enlightenment era, where money is what comes from a government printing press or computer entry. The Constitution, against the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, is whatever nine unelected lawyers in DC say it is. Soon we will have computerized voting, and a few keystrokes with the right password and any vote count desired is delivered. As Stalin pointed out, "It doesn't matter who votes, it matters who counts the votes."

We have to deal with the world as it is, and not confuse reality with our hopes and dreams.

83 posted on 09/30/2003 1:11:22 AM PDT by Iris7 (Victory, always Victory, at any cost, though the beasts of Hell march against us!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: caltrop
To explain the brilliance of Bush's plan would take many pages. At the core of the effort is the attempt to corrupt Iraq with what is usually called Modernity, that is, with the Brittney Spears - Madonna culture. To make them like modern Americans, cultural and religious relativists, multiculteralists, tolerant of any sin, and engaged in endless efforts to impress the Jones, or in this case the Mohammad next door.

To buy cars on time, houses on mortgage, to "invest" in the stock market, to demand the "right" to health care and social security pensions.

This culture of ours is the most lethal of all of our weapons, vastly more effective than any number of nukes, and will spread from Iraq throughout the Moslem world.

The West being rich the Moslem can stand, by saying to himself that he is more virtuous than any American and that the American's have stolen all of their wealth from people like himself. To see Iraq "prosperous and peaceful" would shatter his world view. Total demoralization follows. Islam would no longer be of world - historical importance.

84 posted on 09/30/2003 1:28:16 AM PDT by Iris7 (Victory, always Victory, at any cost, though the beasts of Hell march against us!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: caltrop
This $87,000,000,000 - A sizeable chunk of cash, certainly, must have taken all night to print out the mass of hundreds, 870,000,000 pieces of paper, actually a great weight, is for BRIBES, enough money to give every Iraqi a $100 dollars.

It would be wastefull to hand it out for nothing, and instead the money will pay for many things for many people, reliable electricity, roads, drinking water, sewage systems, millions of well paying jobs, and Home Depots, car dealerships, McDonalds, furniture and appliance stores, internet and cell phone vendors where thy can spend their money. Televise American television dubbed in Arabic, a hundred channels on the cable that carries the broadband for their entertainment.

They wouldn't stand a chance.

85 posted on 09/30/2003 2:03:59 AM PDT by Iris7 (Victory, always Victory, at any cost, though the beasts of Hell march against us!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
Lost a zero, should be "enough money to give every Iraqi a $1000 dollars."
86 posted on 09/30/2003 2:18:34 AM PDT by Iris7 (Victory, always Victory, at any cost, though the beasts of Hell march against us!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
"We have to deal with the world as it is, and not confuse reality with our hopes and dreams. "

Nicely stated.

Although I disagree with some on this discussion, I respect their views. Unfortunately, I too beleive that we no longer live in a reality that truly exalts and respects the individual constitutional freedoms given to us by our forefathers.

Our nation is being attacked on all sides, internally and externally. Each, I believe, is attempting to destroy or reshape our culture. To me it is a matter of priority, I see the external threats as having the biggest opportunity to unleash death and chaos within our borders.

Many see the Middle East as just another skirmish that we should not be involved in, I don't. I see what is going on as an inevitable confrontation between two cultures.

The dictates of Islam are quite clear; the spreading of their way of life to all corners of the globe is their mandate. It is far from being a coincidence that of all the major armed conflicts taking place in our world today, over 90% involve Islamic Fundamentalists. From Southern Europe, to the far east, and now even to our shores, the Islamic crusade is on the move.

I don't see how isolating ourselves from the inevitable confrontation will make us safer. I believe that will only serve to hugely magnify the cost in defending our nation.

At this time in history our country has been given a unique opportunity to act. We can attempt to write our own history, rather than have it be written for us. I believe that is what the current Administration is attempting. I believe they see Iraq as the first, and most important, piece in this experiment.

If the Moslem world in the Middle East can't, or refuses, to accept our right as a culture to exist and prosper than all bets will be off. If that is the future, 9-11 will look like a walk in the park on both sides.

I pray our attempts at reshaping the Middle East work, I don't like to think of the alternative.

IMHO, take it or leave it.
87 posted on 09/30/2003 5:04:36 AM PDT by PigRigger (Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
Of course we are in a post-republic period, with no respect for our Constitutional rule of law.

Two questions:

1- do you think it can be saved, or do you think it's OK

and

2- what are you doing about it
88 posted on 09/30/2003 6:50:33 AM PDT by bc2 (http://www.thinkforyourself.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: bc2
Hi, bc,

"do you think it can be saved"? - no.

"do you think it's OK"? Do I like what has happened? no. Do I see it as inevitable when I look at history in detail since the 16th Century and the American experience in particular? With sadness, yes.

"what are you doing about it?" - As each generation must, we must build from the rubble left behind by the previous generations, sifting usable bricks and stone, steel and copper, out of the waste of old dreams. Socialism was tremendously powerful in this country from the end of WWI, and the lust for socialism can be seen in the Union side of the war of 1861. There is a lot needing building. Hundreds of years of effort have proved to be fruitless. I try to get people to see that the basic structure of their everyday lives has changed, and has to change more. I am afraid and nearly certain that instead of changing how they see themselves and reality people will not change their hearts and minds soon enough, and will elect a "man on horseback" who will "save them from repression and servitude" to the "soulless Corporations" and the "rich" when the times go bad. Pretty bad times at the moment, actually, and wait for the inflation - deflation - inflation and unemployment on the horizon.

I raise my family, and try to prepare them by trying to make them think and see clearly, and work on the hearts and minds of those around me. Many illusions will have to go. Faith in "democracy" and the essential goodness of human nature will be lost. So will the hope that Government can be "good." Perhaps government as "neccesary" or "unavoidable" will replace government as "Uncle Sugar" combined with "a fountain of justice."

This sounds pessimistic but is actually not. Something good cannot be built until we stop trying to make the impossible happen. There are many positive possibilities. The Iraq business, the Empire, the dilemma we face generally, could have been avoided. We will come to see that this is so. What we now see are the fruits of hubris, as the ancient Greeks put it. The Tower to Heaven falls, Babel, and the people are dispersed into separate languages and tribes.

There will be an attempt to revive the ancient traditions of our culture, Duty, Honor, Country, as MacArthur put it, and it will succeed. I work toward this. Whether the future generations can build something good upon the foundation we the living leave behind depends on how well we build, but in the end will be up to them.

89 posted on 09/30/2003 9:27:57 AM PDT by Iris7 (Victory, always Victory, at any cost, though the beasts of Hell march against us!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson