To: mrs tiggywinkle
99.9% of those posts were based almost exclusively on the flawed reasoning that we should vote for Arnold because "he can win".
This is an unacceptable reason.
All other reasons favor McClintock over Scharzenegger. No, this wasn't simply to bash Arnold. It's the old question left unanswered satisfactorily: "Why"
76 posted on
09/29/2003 11:02:44 AM PDT by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: Maelstrom
Bases on what I know of California, which isn't all that much, it seems to me that more Dems are voting for Arnold that Republicans. I can't imagine that California is actually 68% Republican. I am more inclined to think the Republican vote is pretty evenly split, and that leaves Arnold with more Dems than Republicans. You need to post this question on a Democratic web site.
To: Maelstrom
**99.9% of those posts were based almost exclusively on the flawed reasoning that we should vote for Arnold because "he can win". **
Not true. Perhaps you should take some time to read over the thousands of posts. You'll find an amazing amount of repeated explanation why Schwarzenegger is the best candidate, in many peoples opinions.
I tend to believe you'll not read over those posts. Rather, you'll most likely choose to stand with your feet in the cement, chanting anti-Schwarzenegger slogans, not listening to reason or opinion or direct quotes from the man himself.
sigh.
To: Maelstrom
Here ya go. Just to speed things up for ya.
88 posted on
09/29/2003 11:07:10 AM PDT by
EggsAckley
(..........................I report...THEY decide.....................)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson