Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spy Games
NationalReviewOnline ^ | September 29, 2003 | Clifford D. May

Posted on 09/29/2003 9:46:31 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife

It's the top story in the Washington Post this morning as well as in many other media outlets. Who leaked the fact that the wife of Joseph C. Wilson IV worked for the CIA?

What also might be worth asking: "Who didn't know?"

I believe I was the first to publicly question the credibility of Mr. Wilson, a retired diplomat sent to Niger to look into reports that Saddam Hussein had attempted to purchase yellowcake uranium for his nuclear-weapons program.

On July 6, Mr. Wilson wrote an op-ed for the New York Times in which he said: "I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat."

On July 11, I wrote a piece for NRO arguing that Mr. Wilson had no basis for that conclusion — and that his political leanings and associations (not disclosed by the Times and others journalists interviewing him) cast serious doubt on his objectivity.

On July 14, Robert Novak wrote a column in the Post and other newspapers naming Mr. Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, as a CIA operative.

That wasn't news to me. I had been told that — but not by anyone working in the White House. Rather, I learned it from someone who formerly worked in the government and he mentioned it in an offhanded manner, leading me to infer it was something that insiders were well aware of.

I chose not to include it (I wrote a second NRO piece on this issue on July 18) because it didn't seem particularly relevant to the question of whether or not Mr. Wilson should be regarded as a disinterested professional who had done a thorough investigation into Saddam's alleged attempts to purchase uranium in Africa.

What did appear relevant could easily be found in what the CIA would call "open sources." For example, Mr. Wilson had long been a bitter critic of the current administration, writing in such left-wing publications as The Nation that under President Bush, "America has entered one of it periods of historical madness" and had "imperial ambitions."

What's more, he was affiliated with the pro-Saudi Middle East Institute and he had recently been the keynote speaker for the Education for Peace in Iraq Center, a far-Left group that opposed not only the U.S. military intervention in Iraq but also the sanctions and the no-fly zones that protected Iraqi Kurds and Shias from being slaughtered by Saddam.

Mr. Wilson is now saying (on C-SPAN this morning, for example) that he opposed military action in Iraq because he didn't believe Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and he foresaw the possibility of a difficult occupation. In fact, prior to the U.S. invasion, Mr. Wilson told ABC's Dave Marash that if American troops were sent into Iraq, Saddam might "use a biological weapon in a battle that we might have. For example, if we're taking Baghdad or we're trying to take, in ground-to-ground, hand-to-hand combat."

Equally, important and also overlooked: Mr. Wilson had no apparent background or skill as an investigator. As Mr. Wilson himself acknowledged, his so-called investigation was nothing more than "eight days drinking sweet mint tea and meeting with dozens of people" at the U.S. embassy in Niger. Based on those conversations, he concluded that "it was highly doubtful that any [sale of uranium from Niger to Iraq] had ever taken place."

That's hardly the same as disproving what British intelligence believed — and continues to believe: that Saddam Hussein was actively attempting to purchase uranium from somewhere in Africa. (Whether Saddam succeeded or not isn't the point; were Saddam attempting to make such purchases it would suggest that his nuclear-weapons-development program was active and ongoing.)

For some reason, this background and these questions have been consistently omitted in the Establishment media's reporting on Mr. Wilson and his charges.

There also remains this intriguing question: Was it primarily due to the fact that Mr. Wilson's wife worked for the CIA that he received the Niger assignment?

Mr. Wilson has said that his mission came about following a request from Vice President Cheney. But it appears that if Mr. Cheney made the request at all, he made it of the CIA and did not know Mr. Wilson and certainly did not specify that he wanted Mr. Wilson put on the case.

It has to be seen as puzzling that the agency would deal with an inquiry from the White House on a sensitive national-security matter by sending a retired, Bush-bashing diplomat with no investigative experience. Or didn't the CIA bother to look into Mr. Wilson's background?

If that's what passes for tradecraft in Langley, we're in more trouble than any of us have realized.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushadmin; cia; clifforddmay; hussein; iraq; josephwilson; leaks; niger; secret; uranium; valerieplame; washingtondc; wife; wilson; yellowcake

1 posted on 09/29/2003 9:46:31 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Great post.
2 posted on 09/29/2003 9:55:30 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Sometimes its helpful to just be clear about things.

Wilson lied. He lied on several levels.

His first lie was to say that he "investigated" the issue, when he did not. He flew to Niger, asked the government for its answer, and parroted their answer back home. That is not an investigation. That is tourism.

Secondly, he answered a charge that Bush did not make. Bush didn't say there was a sale, he said Iraq "sought" uranium. By denying a charge that was not made, and then calling Bush a liar, he is himself lying. It is a propagandist's sleight of hand, sophomorically obvious, and you wouldn't imagine anyone would fall for it. But when you have a sympathetic press and a public that doesn't read past the headlines, it works just fine. But an obvious lie is still a lie.

His third lie is to say that the uranium mines there are so well monitored that no such sale could ever take place. But the IAEA says that they are undermanned there, and lack the legal authority to monitor the mines. So he lied again.

Finally, why would the CIA send someone to Niger to determine whether or not Iraq "sought" uranium there, when the trade mission by its senior diplomat was public knowledge? In other words, that Iraq sought uranium from Niger is not even in doubt, it is no secret, it is public knowledge. Why waste the plane ticket?

But then if your purpose was to "investigate" whether or not the sale took place, wouldn't you launch a real investigation? Wouldn't you interview truckers, intercept communications, monitor the port, infiltrate the mines, get your people inside the mine offices? Wilson did none of that. But according to Tenet, he did report that an Iraqi "businessman" had come calling, this shortly after the public trade mission from ambassador Zahawie. But he didn't mention either in his op-ed where he labeled Bush a liar. The one, we have to take Tenet's word for, since Wilson didn't make a written report. The other, though, is public knowledge that Wilson conspicuously leaves out of his op-ed, because to include it would blow an enormous hole in his propaganda piece.

It seems impolite to call people liars, and its seldom done in public life. But in this case it is inescapable that Wilson purposely left out the most important piece of this non-mystery, which is only a mystery because he left out the most important piece.

That Bush told the truth is not even in question. The information to back up his story didn't have to come from British intel, although they may have further details that we don't know, but the basic facts are public and are not in question at all.

Wilson is a propagandist, and Wilson lied.
3 posted on 09/29/2003 10:18:46 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley; cyncooper; PhiKapMom
"On July 14, Robert Novak wrote a column in the Post and other newspapers naming Mr. Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, as a CIA operative.

"That wasn't news to me. I had been told that — but not by anyone working in the White House. Rather, I learned it from someone who formerly worked in the government and he mentioned it in an offhanded manner, leading me to infer it was something that insiders were well aware of. "

So maybe it wasn't such a big "secret?"

4 posted on 09/29/2003 10:41:11 AM PDT by MizSterious (Support whirled peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Meant to ping you as well. Article author doesn't seem to think there was much secrecy about Mrs. Plame-Wilson's occupation.

5 posted on 09/29/2003 10:42:45 AM PDT by MizSterious (Support whirled peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife

I could tell you where I got this, but then I'd have to kill you.

6 posted on 09/29/2003 10:44:46 AM PDT by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
ROTFL

Very good!
7 posted on 09/29/2003 10:45:40 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marron
IF memory serves wilson is a prince algore devotee and appointee.
8 posted on 09/29/2003 10:54:57 AM PDT by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
BTTT! Rush is talking about this article right now and will link to it from his web site http://www.rushlimbaugh.com

Thanks for posting it -- I was going to post it myself until I did a search.
9 posted on 09/29/2003 10:55:00 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Why do America's enemies desperately want DemocRATS back in power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
So maybe it wasn't such a big "secret?"

Maybe not, but what do you think would happen to an official who 'leaked' that there were nukes on a military installation that everyone already 'knew' had them?

10 posted on 09/29/2003 11:00:32 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Grut
You missed my point. If a lot of people knew about it, why should we believe Wilson (a known liar) when he says it came from the administration? Anyone who knew about it could have leaked it to Novak. Or, for that matter, Novak may have been one of the people who knew, and he just hoped to toss some mud on the administration. Novak is no friend of the Bush admin.



11 posted on 09/29/2003 11:11:25 AM PDT by MizSterious (Support whirled peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Doesn't the fact that Wilson went to Niger, while his wife is a CIA operative, put his wife in danger? Doesn't the blame start with him, first of all?
12 posted on 09/29/2003 11:17:48 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Sorry. Laws do not apply to Democrats.
13 posted on 09/29/2003 12:13:19 PM PDT by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GailA; Pan_Yans Wife; Shermy
IF memory serves wilson is a prince algore devotee and appointee.

Wilson served Gore during the eighties, he worked with Clark during the nineties, and he worked for Clinton as a special advisor for African affairs during the nineties as well. He organized Clinton's African trips.

In an earlier post I said that he had been part of the Gore presidential campaign; I remembered reading that somewhere. But I can't find anything now to confirm that, maybe I have conflated a couple of memories. Can anyone confirm or deny whether he was active during the campaign? Did I mis-speak?

I notice now that there is such a huge crush of new articles that they crowd out the old ones when you try to do a search. Its frustrating...

14 posted on 09/29/2003 12:49:20 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
In one of Wilson's interviews, he told the interviewer that he thought it was particularly bad that his wife's maiden name had been released. However, on his bio page (several links to it have been posted on other threads), her maiden name was given.

This man is a dyed-in-the-wool liar, period. He'll say whatever it takes to cause damage to this administration.
15 posted on 09/29/2003 1:45:02 PM PDT by MizSterious (Support whirled peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Restoring embedded links, and providing FR links as availabe...



On July 6, Mr. Wilson wrote an op-ed for the New York Times in which he said: "I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat."

On July 11, I wrote a piece for NRO arguing that Mr. Wilson had no basis for that conclusion

FR: Scandal! Bush’s enemies aren't telling the truth about what he said.
Posted here and here



(I wrote a second NRO piece on this issue on July 18)

FR: No Yellowcake Walk
Posted here



Mr. Wilson had long been a bitter critic of the current administration, writing in such left-wing publications as The Nation that under President Bush, "America has entered one of it periods of historical madness" and had "imperial ambitions."

FR: n/a



he was affiliated with the pro-Saudi Middle East Institute and he had recently been the keynote speaker for the Education for Peace in Iraq Center, a far-Left group that

FR: Articles mentioning "Middle East Institute"
Google search here



Clifford D. May, a former New York Times foreign correspondent, is president of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a policy institute focusing on terrorism.

FR: Articles by (mentioning) "Clifford D. May"
Google search here

16 posted on 09/29/2003 2:07:05 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson