It is either:
a) true, in which case somebody's head is going to roll and we would be fools if we did not demand a good head-rolling. or,
b) Not true, in which case somebody looks like a abject fool who doesn't have their facts straight, and they ought to still be drawn and quartered or tarred and feathered. or,
c) it is partially true, the operational word being "analyst" and not "operative". In which case, while nasty, such a revelation not as damaging to the interests of the United States.
Which of these do Freepers think happened? I believe it would be one of the three, or else someone else leaked a true allegation, but it was attributed to White House source(s).