Posted on 09/29/2003 7:14:59 AM PDT by Theodore R.
Iraq & Tet, George W. & LBJ
Posted: September 29, 2003 1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2003 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
"Things perceived as real are real in their consequences."
So it has been wisely written, and repeated so often it has become a cliche.
The Tet Offensive of 1968 was a desperate roll of the dice by the Viet Cong. It ended in their disastrous defeat. Some 50,000 of its critical cadre were killed, and all the gains of Tet were rolled back by the Americans in three weeks.
But America, which had been hearing only triumphal news of U.S. victories, was stunned by the enemy's capture of Hue and the massacre of 3,000 of its leaders, and by Viet Cong sappers trading fire with Marines on the grounds of the U.S. Embassy in Saigon. And the American media portrayed Tet as a communist triumph.
"If we've lost Walter Cronkite, we've lost the country," LBJ is reputed to have said after Tet, when the CBS anchor declared the war unwinnable. After Tet, the establishment that had marched us into Vietnam broke and joined the antiwar movement, just as soon as Richard Nixon finished taking his oath of office.
George W. Bush is in a situation today similar to that faced by Lyndon Johnson at the time of Tet.
While U.S. casualties in Iraq, five dead a week, do not approach the 150 we lost every week, for seven years, in Vietnam, the home front does call to mind 1968 and even the early Nixon years.
The behavior of Senate Democrats today, savaging the same president they gave a blank check for war last October, may be repellent. But it reflects a cold assessment that President Bush is vulnerable on Iraq, that the postwar mess is erasing in the public's mind the brilliance of our victory, and that his calls to unity and a suspension of politics-as-usual in debating the War on Terror may be safely ignored.
Consider the reaction to Sen. Kennedy's brutal charge that the war was nothing but a "fraud," concocted in Texas, to advance the interests of the GOP. If true, this would be an impeachable offense.
But when the president retorted that the Kennedy accusation was "uncivil," Senate Democrats rallied to Kennedy. Said Sen. Joe Biden, ranking Democrat on Foreign Relations, the Bush administration's "leading members believed we would find an oil-rich functioning country, that we'd be met by cheering crowds, that all we had to do was sweep out the top Baathist layers, implant our favorite exiles, and watch democracy take root as the bulk of our troops returned home by Christmas."
Biden has provided a succinct but accurate description of the neocon party line, prior to the war. What he failed to say is that he, as well as Sens. Kerry, Lieberman, Edwards, Daschle and Clinton, as well as Rep. Gephardt, swallowed that line, or refused to challenge that Utopian vision before transferring to the president their constitutional power to decide on war or peace.
Kennedy's rhetoric was over the top. But, at least, he – and Rep. Kucinich and Gov. Dean – stood up against attacks on their patriotism to oppose the war before, not after, its fruits had turned rancid.
Which brings us back around to President Bush. Whether we are making headway in winning the hearts and minds or the Iraqi people, or whether the Iraqis want us out of their country and support those fighting to throw us out, the perception here in our own country is that Iraq is a mess.
Also clear is that the American people are coming to conclude that we ought to cut our losses, get our troops out and turn it over to the Iraqis, or to the United Nations, as early as the transfer can be arranged.
If Bush intends to fight this war to victory, he had best begin to prepare the American people for the long, hard road ahead. This he has not done. Indeed, every indication is that he, and even Secretary Rumsfeld, have no intention of sending in more U.S. troops, but are looking for the next exit ramp out of Baghdad.
Yet they should know it is not only opportunistic ex-hawks in the Democratic Party who hope to secure advantage out of any debacle of a U.S. retreat. The French, Germans, U.N. and anti-Americans all over the world are slavering over the possibility of a humiliating retreat of the American Empire.
One wonders: Does President Bush realize that by listening to the siren's call of the neocons he has put his presidency in peril? Does he recognize now that they fed him a warmed-over policy they had cooked up long before 9-11, and had even tried to feed Clinton, who had the good sense to reject it?
Well I guess 2 out of 20 ain't bad....
The Democrats may not see it, but the American people do. We either fight them over there, or we fight them here, those are the only choices we have.
(Another big difference is that big media can not longer control the news. If there was an internet when Tet occurred the lies and propagand told to us by the big three would never have taken hold.
Do you agree with that? Other than Bush talk the talk 'we are in for a long fight', we are not getting the walk the walk with costs and a plan.
Pat is right, we have more an exit strategy than a long fight strategy.
Pat has lost the ability to read and comprehend, so he probably needs to listen to GWB's speeches live.
Sad, but Pat is getting the Barry Goldwater disease.
Will someone just shoot me when I get old and senile?
Does Pat recognize that this war kicks one leg out from under Islamist terrorism? Does he recognize that we are within reach of a democratic middle east? If Iraq is made secure, it will provide the anchor for a bulwark of modern states: Turkey, Iraq, Israel, and possibly Jordan and Egypt.
It's not a perfect world, Pat. Accept it. Russia is not perfect but it is better, and Reagan made it so. Bush's policies will obtain the same result if backbiters like you just shut up.
HEre is where Pat is full of it. It was the Powell/armitage/Rice cabal which opposed extending troops into Syria and keeping troops in to secure the borders which left our guys at greater risk. And it is the MEDIA which is falsely reporting we are losing in Iraq when EVEN THE SAUDIS say we are winning.
Perhaps the crowd that chooses to deny political reality and despises anyone who speaks of it is the same crowd that, nearly always, succumbs to the political lies that preceded and, in lieu of any rational defense of their willingness to go along with all that political deceit, they offer only an emotional tantrum.
If Bush intends to fight this war to victory, he had best begin to prepare the American
people for the long, hard road ahead. This he has not done. Indeed, every indication is that
he, and even Secretary Rumsfeld, have no intention of sending in more U.S. troops, but are
looking for the next exit ramp out of Baghdad.
Apparently Mr. Buchanan has a faulty, or selective, memory. This from President Bush's recent speech to the UN:
Two years ago, I told the Congress and the country that the war on
terror would be a lengthy war, a different kind of war, fought on
many fronts in many places. Iraq is now the central front. Enemies
of freedom are making a desperate stand there - and there they
must be defeated. This will take time, and require sacrifice.
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/2462432/detail.html
Too bad Mr. Buchanan failed to do a "Google News" search, he would have discovered that the administration is getting ready to send 15,000 more troops to Iraq.
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&edition=us&q=more+troops+iraq&btnG=Search+News
anti-Americans all over the world are slavering over the possibility of a humiliating
retreat of the American Empire.
Just as you seem to be, Mr. Buchanan. Go, Pat, Go...Please.
DG
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.