Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nuconvert
Orin writes: "Bush administration has been remarkably inept at communicating the success stories out of Iraq."

Here the press, including Orin, should take some responsibility for excluding the good, and spinning the negative. The Bush administration has been remarkably consistent in their message, even to the point of inviting media criticism for always being "on message". The media does like sensationalism, particularly if it undercuts our efforts in Iraq which would tend to support the Democrat position that fighting in Iraq was a fraud. Is it ineptitude, or bias? Both are well documented.

18 posted on 09/29/2003 6:27:19 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: OESY
Agreed. The Bush administration has been remarkably inept at communicating success.

The reason, the media intones, is not for lack of facts.

It is for lack of efficacy.

That is, the Bush administration haven't kicked the media's ass and embarrassed them to the point of humiliation.

Good God. Someday, Conservatives will awaken to the key to the success of political power in America.

What is the key?

Read on to find out, if you dare. Schwarzenegger's got it. Reagan had it. Dad Bush did not and lost. McNader doesn't have a chance. Senate leader Lott and now Frist were AWOL on this quality, and it has seriously undermined the Bush administration because of their lack of it. Buckley, in spite of his intellect, never had it. Neither does Will. But Rush - the man practically invented it and sweats it from every pore. Miller's got it. Coulter? Oh yeah, she carries the torch proudly. It saved the 2000 election, and is the only thing that will save America.

Does W. Bush have it? Yes, but he's reluctant to use it unless he feels he must, when it is sometimes too late. He needs to get it front and center, flat out, no holds barred. He is isolated by advisors who do not have this quality, nor understand how important it is.

What is it?

The Segway? No.

It is the Power of the Warrior Crusader, the fierce and menacing street-wise take no enemies Freeper Conservatives.

Freepers are largely responsible for taking back the election in 2000 with grassroots robust protests and effective dissemination of the truth at a time when our entire lives and futures could have turned on a more passive approach.

Like our forefathers who created this great nation, Warrior Freepers share a burning desire to protect and advance freedom and liberty in the world, and to expose and destroy the Evil of creeping Socialism. We have a deep, immovable passion for America, and we are Good.

It is my opinion that the foremost quality for nominating a candidate for future political office in the new millennium is simply this (to paraphrase Elaine on Seinfeld:) IS THAT CANDIDATE WARRIOR FREEPER WORTHY?

Almost nothing else matters. To be a Trent Lott sitting-duck, or a Bill Frist debating with the demagogues Schumer and Rangel, you need to be a courageous fighter first and foremost to penetrate the left-wing media conspiracy, withstand and anticipate the lies and deception of the Socialists, and get in the faces of the voters.

The Liberal Liars rely on the good-natured and pious polite intelligent conservatives of years past when they spread their deception and shamelessness across the air waves directly to the voters. If not, no amount of intelligence, qualification, or experience can make up a lack of this quality.

But now, Warrior Freepers are holding these weasels accountable, by their throats. You are either WARRIOR FREEPER WORTHY, or you are not a qualified Conservative candidate.

WARRIOR FREEPERS RULE THE EARTH.


20 posted on 09/29/2003 7:22:29 AM PDT by Stallone (If you're a McNader, you're part of the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: OESY
"...press, including Orin, should take some responsibility for excluding the good, and spinning the negative"

Yes. Agreed.

However, I don't think the White House and fellow republicans have been out there at every opportunity, letting the public know all the achievements being made in Iraq. They could be hammering away and repeating their message over and over, just as the left does, to convince people that what we're doing in Iraq is absolutely necessary; to convince them that leaving now is not an option and the pricetag is cheap at twice the cost. If they had effectively done this, the poll numbers wouldn't be where they are today for Bush and the Iraq policy. Every republican senator and congressman should be loudly supporting our efforts in Iraq, the war against terrorism, and the need for the billions of dollars to get the job done. I think it's been pretty quiet lately, with the exception of the State Dept. (and I'm not a big State dept fan, usually)

21 posted on 09/29/2003 12:26:29 PM PDT by nuconvert ( Stop thinking about it, just do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson