Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tallhappy
You wrote that Schwarzenegger is much worse than Busty.

That needs mucho explaining.

Can you honestly say that CALIFORNIA would be better off with Busty as governor than with Arnold? not conservatives, not republicans, not your or me, but would CALIFORNIA be better off?

If so, you need to explain.
72 posted on 09/27/2003 9:38:00 PM PDT by fqued (California = Caliph's paradise??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: fqued
Schwarzenegger will implement benefits for "domestic partners".

He opposes prop 54.

He agrees with Bustamante on tax payer support for illegal immigrants.

Schwarzenegger opposes school vouchers to allow taxpayers to use the money they all ready paid to send their children to the school of their choice.

I would rather have a democrat carry out a democrat agenda than a Republican.

Schwarzenegger would set a precedent that will move to other states and races which will make the Republicans be unable to run pro-life or pro-family candidates.

It essentially morphs the Repubs and dems. The Repubs will become a center left party and the dems a lefter left party.

94 posted on 09/27/2003 9:54:16 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson