[dogbyte12]

When President Hillary Clinton's minions do something like this in 2009, or President Dean, or whoever the rats finally get into office, I want all of you who say it is no big deal, to either zip it, or stay consistent.

I always use the Hillary factor on these stories. That is what pisses so many bots off. If Hillary did something like this, what would my reaction be. Would I defend it, deny it, ignore it, or what?

It should be investigated, prosecuted, punished.

[Miss Marple]

One other thing. Wilson's wife wasn't out in the field as an operative. She was an analyst at Langley, and that information could have been ascertained by anyone who followed her to work. We are not talking about revealing the identity of a spy overseas.

[BushisTheMan]

I always use the Hillary factor on these stories. ... It should be investigated, prosecuted, punished.

And therein lies the rub. If it was the Clintons, it would never be investigated, prosecuted, or punished. My question: why would the CIA send an former "acting" ambassbor to do CIA field work anyway? I think the Wilsons are scum.

[Asclepius]

When President Hillary Clinton's minions do something like this in 2009, or President Dean, or whoever the rats finally get into office, I want all of you who say it is no big deal, to either zip it, or stay consistent.

If presidents Clinton or Dean ever expose some revenge-of-the-clerks plot in the CIA, I will be the first to raise my glass to salute them.

[cyncooper]

When Hillary is accused it will be more likely she did something wrong.

Isn't it amazing that Wilson is tight with the clintons, btw?

I go by the individual adminstrations. Leveling the same accusation at both does not make both guilty. The Bush administration's track record is a law abiding one. If someone did break a law I expect them to be prosecuted, but I just don't think that will be the finding in this case.