To: webber
Why didn't he run against Dole? This guy drops napalm.
3 posted on
09/27/2003 2:13:26 PM PDT by
kylaka
To: kylaka; Howlin
Why didn't he run against Dole? This guy drops napalm.Good question. Except that the establishment had already chosen her Dolt. Howlin, from a first look this is a guy I would vote for. Any chance of replacing a worthless Senator with this guy in 2006?
25 posted on
12/15/2003 1:25:33 PM PST by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: kylaka
He doesn't have the money for a statewide campaign. He does have the money for this race-- almost. Tell all your friends to donate a ten spot to him. There are a couple of people in the race trying to buy the seat. He's second in fundraising I think. He needs our help!
http://vernonrobinson.com/robinson_contents/contribute/27 posted on
12/15/2003 1:34:21 PM PST by
GraniteStateConservative
("Howard Dean is incontrovertible proof that God is on Bush's side in the 2004 election"- Dick Morris)
To: kylaka
>>Why didn't he run against Dole? This guy drops napalm.
Yeah, baby! Why can't I find any candidates like this? I liked this:
>>In 2002, I ran 15 points ahead of our popular new Senator (Elizabeth Dole) in the precincts our races had in common. No other Republican can say that.
No wonder he ran so far ahead of her - she looks like a RINO to many. By contrast, this guy has a strong, coherent, conservative message.
53 posted on
12/16/2003 4:14:28 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson