Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

YES!  VINDICATION!

Finally, although they missed the most important point, a major news source skirts the issue.

(I feel vindicated.  This is an issue that I have written about on numerous occasions, since 1996.  Finally, the major media is getting colse to the truth.  See the permanent , annually updated article, Tick-Tick-Tick - The Economy Bomb, that covers this issue in detail.  I will update that article with the just released numbers from the IRS, within a few days.  Also, the article, 1986-2000 IRS Collections Data by Income Group, will be updated to include the 2001 data and links to that newly released IRS data)

One of the primary reason that the incomes of the rich fell in 2001, is the fact that many of our wealthiest taxpayers left the United States in 2001 and took all of their wealth with them.  According to pre-Patriot Act, pre-9/11 estimates from the then, INS, almost 300,000 people would leave the United States in 2001.  How many of those do you think were poor?  Think about it...

In fact, although only a handful of that almost 300,000 expatriates actually bothered to officially renounce their US citizenship, there is much very good reason to conclude that almost all of them were in the upper strata of income earners, with it being weighted heavily toward the very wealthiest 1% of income earners.

Then consider two other facts.  1) Those estimates were made prior to the implementation of the USA (Un)Patriot Act, which was, without a doubt, the greatest assault on privacy and the 4th Amendment in the history of the United States.  2) Many high level business transactions rely upon privacy until they are actually completed and announced.  That combination creates a huge incentive for the wealthy, who have been under attack by both parties for years, to finally make the decision to move to a more wealth friendly country, with a more secure business environment.  The result is that those pre-(Un)Patriot Act estimates are probably far below the actual numbers.

People like Bruce Bartlett are so concerned with looking for economic reasons for such events that they never look for other outside factors, such as emigration of our wealthiest citizens.  They spend all of their time studying the stock markets, the Fed and IRS regulations and trying to relate them to what they see happening, that they often fail to observe the outside social factors that actually may be having a more significant effect on the economy than anything else.  Normally, that would be a safe conclusion, since social factors usually only have a minor effect on the economy.  However, since the people that we are talking about are the same people who pay almost all of our taxes and fund most of our companies, a very small shift in that group can have a devastating effect on our economy.

The problem isn't the tax rate or a dip in the stock markets.  It is the intrusiveness of and the unbridled threat represented by the IRS that is the problem.  The wealthy are leaving, because they are sick and tired of having the IRS scrutinize every transaction, to see if they can squeeze an extra dollar out of it.  But, now that they are having to meet the heavy and time-consuming (Un)Patriot Act compliance requirements, many wealthy people are finding that their ability to do business in a world where the difference in success or failure may rest in your ability to complete a deal in hours, is being threatened by such time-consuming requirements.  Now, they are being forced to seek relief in other countries.

Sure, the wealthy in the US are making less money.  That's because so many of the wealthy are leaving and people with lower incomes are suddenly included in that upper bracket.  The result is that, as the above article shows, the people in the next lower income bracket are going to have start shouldering more of the tax load.  But, that won't happen for long, because as more of the wealthy leave, that extra tax load will have to be distributed downward.  If you haven't felt it yet, you soon will.

It's time to abolish the Income Tax and IRS, repeal the (Un)Patriot Act and HSA and implement a non-intrusive National Retail Sales Tax, that will draw wealth back into this country, before it's too late.

 

1 posted on 09/27/2003 12:01:18 PM PDT by Action-America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Action-America
I read a report...I think it was Wall Street Journal that claimed the rich got richer by 10% while everyone else's income fell in record numbers.

Speaking personally, I know three multimillionaires. NONE of them pay Fed tax. NONE of them.
106 posted on 09/27/2003 8:16:59 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Action-America
I already have a second passport. After my current venture has a liquidity event, I'm very inclined to turn by back on Ashcroft Nation.
120 posted on 09/28/2003 9:12:30 AM PDT by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Action-America
I love stuff like this that shows my inner city students just why it really is bad that the class warfare waged by their party is bad for everybody! It also shows how all their favorite rap stars and pro-ball players also fall into that "1%" category and yet they themselves are pushing for this "TAX THE RICH" mentality.....think they listened in their economics classes? Worse, given the liberal mindset of the average teacher, think this info was even presented? The AGENDA at work once again.

This is why the school administration hates me so much and why my classes are in such high demand. Kids talk to the other younger kids every year and tell them who will give it "straight" and who's shovels the B$.

122 posted on 09/28/2003 10:13:29 AM PDT by ExSoldier (My OTHER auto is a .45!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Action-America
Hunh? Our dear Democrats have told us that the rich don't pay taxes! They don't pay their fair share! < /sarcasm>

I say take the annual budget ($2,000B) and divide it equally by the number of US adults (200 million) and send a bill to everyone for $10,000.

Forgive the permanently handicapped.

Provide unforgiveable commercial loans to the needy and students. (Could be worked off by direct government service)

Charge each new legal immigrant $10k in advance, and $10k per year to stay.

Charge the Mexican/Canadian government $50k per each illegal immigrant with $20k to go to local law enforcement and the adult illegal alien to be held in jail until paid or for a period of 1 year of government service, then deported.

Watch government socialism begin to vanish.

A poor person has no moral or legal superiority over a rich person and should not be allowed to pay less in taxes.

Any other system is not "equality before the law".
127 posted on 09/28/2003 8:22:45 PM PDT by Mark Felton ("All liberty flows from the barrel of a gun")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Action-America
Soaking the rich = biting the hand that feeds you.

I think most libs secretly understand this already; it's just that they're so unbelivably jealous (hateful?) that they can't or won't admit to the truth of it.
128 posted on 09/28/2003 8:26:24 PM PDT by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Action-America
Once again the NYT is wrong- the rich don't pay any taxes.

Well at least Arianna does not.
129 posted on 09/28/2003 9:41:06 PM PDT by Kay Soze (RINOs are unconcerned about other sovereign nations influence in California or the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson