Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Destro
That should read: There was no approved New Testament "scripture" till the first Ecumenical Councils of Bishops put them in order and threw out the rest.
11 posted on 09/27/2003 1:12:57 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Destro
That should read: There was no approved New Testament "scripture" till the first Ecumenical Councils of Bishops put them in order and threw out the rest.


Actually, that is rather simplistic and misleading.
From the early church (before 100 a.d.), certain books were considered authoritative.
By the time of Irenaeus, 180 a.d, there was, in essence, a canon of the New Testament, with only a couple minor epistles up in the air.

303 a.d, Diocletian declared that the Christian books were to be destroyed. what but those that were "canonical?"

Athenasius, Jerome, and Augustine all proclaimed the 27-book canon of the New Testament.

What the Ecumenical Councils (all Churches, not the Eastern Orthodox of today), especially the Synod of Hippo in 393 a.d., did was merely approve WHAT WAS ALREADY KNOWN AND ACCEPTED.
17 posted on 09/27/2003 1:48:02 PM PDT by fqued (California. . . Caliph's paridise??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson